Former Socialist, Former Republican, Former Contributor to The American Spectator, Former Resident of Canada, Back in Boston Area After Stints in New York City & Atlanta, Current Mustache Wearer & Aficionado of Baseball, Bowling in All Its Forms, Cats, Music & Healthy Living
Wednesday, November 27, 2024
Dodgers Add to Well of Pitching Depth with Snell
Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Nova Scotians Re-Elect Tories While NDP Supplants Liberals as Official Opposition
Monday, November 25, 2024
Trump's 25% Tariffs on Canada & Mexico Will Lead to a Recession
Sunday, November 24, 2024
If I Still Lived in Georgia, Warnock & Ossoff Would Have Lost My Vote Over Their Anti-Israel Vote
During my brief tenure in Georgia in late 2020 and early 2021, I voted in the Senate runoff elections which saw Democrats Rafael Warnock and Jon Ossoff unseat Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue to give Democrats control of the U.S. Senate.
I voted for the pair despite my specific misgivings about Warnock's past statements likening Israel to an apartheid regime. However, the pair would provide much needed COVID relief. Something which would not have happened had Republicans been re-elected.
Of course, I would leave Georgia to return to Massachusetts in May 2021. Had I remained in Georgia, I would have voted for Warnock over Herschel Walker in the 2022 mid-terms. But last week both Warnock and Ossoff saw fit to join Bernie Sanders' effort to halt arms sales to Israel which drew tough criticism from Esther Panitch, a Georgia Democratic State Rep and the only Jewish member of the legislature as well as from numerous state and local Jewish groups.
Had I still been in Georgia they both would have lost my vote. Mind you, Warnock isn't up for re-election until 2028. But Ossoff is up for re-election in 2026, and he hopes it will be against Marjorie Taylor-Greene who has an anti-Semitism problem of her own.
I'm sure many Jewish voters in Georgia who are unhappy with Ossoff would not be eager to cast a vote for MTG. However, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp or Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger could vie for the GOP nomination and, if successful, could woo Jewish voters disappointed with Ossoff.
I don't regret my vote for Ossoff and Warnock in 2021. I thought they were the best candidates for those offices at the time despite my reservations and they did what they were elected to do. But no politician is entitled to my vote in perpetuity. Combine my anger at Democrats who openly abandon Israel while still being disdainful of Republicans who won't stand up to Trump, were I still living in Georgia, I'd probably leave my Senate ballot blank by way of protest. Kind of like what I did on my ballot for the Massachusetts Senate race between Elizabeth Warren and John Deaton. Although I'd probably be more open to casting a ballot for Raffensperger than Kemp.
Then again, it could all be academic if President-elect Trump suspends the Constitution after he returns to office and there are no further elections.
Dominican Baseball Pioneer Rico Carty Has Joined Ozzie Virgil, Sr in The Field of Dreams
Saturday, November 23, 2024
Trudeau Stating Canada Would Abide ICC's Warrant to Arrest Netanyahu & Gallant is Diplomatic & Moral Affront
Earlier this week, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant (who Bibi fired earlier this month) over its conduct in Gaza.
That the ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Deif is immaterial. For starters, Deif is dead, killed by Israel last July. Frankly, I'm surprised the ICC didn't charge Netanyahu and Gallant for Deif's death. As it stands, the warrant against Deif is literally a dead letter. But in indicting Deif the ICC is basically telling the world there is no difference between democratically elected leaders and a terrorist organization whose aim and objective is the destruction of Israel.
Aside from the decision itself, what has been equally disgraceful is the response of governments within the EU such as Ireland, The Netherlands and Spain who have indicated they would enforce the warrant. A spokesman for U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated the government would fulfill its "legal obligations" thus making it appear they too would arrest Netanyahu and/or Gallant. Meanwhile, Australia is being deliberately ambiguous.
But the worse response of all has been from Canada, specifically Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who stated, “We stand up for international law, and we will abide by all the all the regulations and rulings of the international courts. This is just who we are as Canadians.”
Trudeau certainly does not speak for all Canadians such as Leo Housakos, a Conservative Senator from Quebec, denounced Trudeau's statement on X:
Disgraceful comments today from Justin Trudeau suggesting Canadian authorities would arrest Israeli PM Netanyahu.
This ill-considered endorsement of the ICC's politically motivated actions is a slap in the face to our ally and every innocent Israeli still being held hostage.
We stand with the people of Israel and support their right to self-defense against terrorism. The actions taken by both the ICC and Justin Trudeau should be considered as a dangerous precedent that threatens global stability and the principles of international law.
Trudeau's statement is in stark with contrast with President Biden's statement which reads:
The ICC issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli leaders is outrageous. Let me be clear once again: whatever the ICC might imply, there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.
Aside from being an immoral affront, Trudeau's statement is also a diplomatic affront and sets a foolish precedent. If a democratically elected leader is subject to an arrest warrant, Trudeau might be vulnerable to the same if the ICC sees fit to rule that Canada is guilty of genocide against Indigenous Peoples. Trudeau should be careful of what he wishes.
If Netanyahu is to be held to account it should be by the Israeli people be during their next election, in their courts or by military inquiry. The ICC ruling suggests that Israel does not have the mechanisms by which to hold Netanyahu to account.
In the grand scheme of things, the ICC ruling against Netanyahu and Gallant, is yet another missile strike in the long international campaign to delegitimize Israel and expel it from the international community. Hopefully, Israel has a diplomatic iron dome which can withstand this international campaign of hatred against Jews.
Gaetz Might Be Gone But Bondi Will Implement Trump's Retribution Agenda
For starters, it is a good thing that Republican Senators showed sufficient force to compel President- elect Donald Trump to tell former Florida Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz to fall on his sword and withdraw his candidacy to be U.S. Attorney General. While it remains to be seen if Gaetz engaged in illegal activities with underaged women, his behavior is certainly boorish and unbecoming. It was far too much for Senate Republicans to bear.
But I am inclined to think that this will be the exception rather than the rule where it concerns Trump's appointees. It very much remains to be seen if Republican Senators will be prepared to push this hard with his other more controversial appointments namely Pete Hegseth for Defense Secretary, Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Even if one or more of the aforementioned candidates withdraws from consideration, Trump is going to get a Secretary of Defense, a Director of National Intelligence, a Secretary of Health and Human Services and an Attorney General be it by confirmation or by recess appointment.
Which brings me to Pam Bondi. I remember Bondi when she was an up-and-coming Republican star as Florida Attorney General in the 2010s with her frequent appearances on Fox News. In particular, I remember her as part of a panel during the 2012 Republican presidential primary which aired on FOX News in December 2011. There were six GOP hopefuls at that forum - Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann.
In addition to Bondi, the other Republican Attorney Generals who were part of that panel were Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt. Cuccinelli later ran unsuccessfully for Governor of Virginia and was the subject of several dubious acting appointments in the first Trump Administration in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of Homeland Security. In March 2020, a federal judge ruled that Cuccinelli's appointments were unlawful and all decisions he made were rendered invalid.
Meanwhile, Pruitt was Trump's EPA Director until he was forced to resign in July 2018 after numerous ethics and management scandals emerged. He subsequently made a bid for the GOP Senate nomination in 2022 in Oklahoma following Jim Inhofe's retirement finishing a distant fifth to Markwayne Mullin who now holds the seat.
As for Bondi, during her tenure as Florida AG, declined to pursue a civil matter against Trump University after receiving an unlawful $25,000 donation from the Donald J. Trump Foundation. Bondi also spoke at the 2016 Republican National Convention and lead chants of, "Lock her up!" against Hillary Clinton. During Trump's first tenure, the former was sufficient for Trump to keep Bondi at bay. As David Graham wrote in The Atlantic. "In 2017, Bondi was passed over for an administration role for fear that she was too scandal-tainted. This time around, she’s the safe, acceptable fallback choice."
Bondi will also be well-suited to implement Trump's retribution agenda. A member of Trump's defense team during both of his impeachment proceedings, Bondi has stated, "Prosecutors will be prosecuted." That means Jack Smith, Fani Willis and Alvin Bragg. Even though she wasn't technically a prosecutor perhaps this also means Liz Cheney with her work as Vice-Chair of the January 6th Committee.
Assuming she doesn't get a recess appointment, I hope Democratic Senators on the Judiciary Committee will ask Bondi a) if she believes that Donald Trump is above the law and b) any investigation into his activities is, by definition, a criminal act.
I also hope the Senate Judiciary Committee does some digging during her time as a registered foreign agent for Qatar during her association with Ballard Partners. Given that Qatar has until very recently harbored Hamas officials, perhaps Bondi provided advice to the Qataris with regard to protecting Hamas members. It might not be a good look if it can be shown that Bondi has ties to a terrorist organization.
For her part, Bondi has called upon the FBI to question pro-Hamas campus protesters. Nevertheless, I think Democrats ought to dig deep regarding her work with the Qatari government because if a foreign agent deals with Qatar there's a very good chance that she also dealt with Hamas.
But Trump is going to get an Attorney General sooner or later and it is more likely than not it will be Pam Bondi.
Friday, November 22, 2024
Judge & Ohtani Were No Brainers to Win AL & NL MVP
Wednesday, November 20, 2024
Tarik Skubal & Chris Sale Close Deal on AL & NL Cy Young Awards
Sale, who turns 35 in March, joins a Braves rotation which includes 20-game winner Spencer Strider, Bryce Elder, Max Fried and 40-year-old Charlie Morton. As such, Sale is not expected to be the ace of the staff. If Sale can pitch 150 innings and win 10 games, the Braves would be very happy with that indeed.
Well, Sale would exceed all expectations stepping up when the Braves lost Strider with season ending elbow surgery. Sale went 18-3 with a 2.38 ERA with 225 strikeouts in 177.2 innings pitched. As with Skubal, Sale would win the pitching Triple Crown as well.
I think Sale benefited tremendously from a change of scenery which took him closer to home. In addition to the NL Cy Young, Sale was also named NL Comeback Player of the Year last week.
Had Sale been healthy all this time, he would be closing in on 3,000 strikeouts. However, Sale's renaissance and his opportunity to build upon it resumes the Cooperstown conversation. Should that not come to pass, Sale has good reason to be proud of the season he just completed.
Tuesday, November 19, 2024
Matt Quatraro & Carlos Mendoza Should've Been Named AL/NL Manager of the Years Instead of Stephen Vogt & Pat Murphy
I have to admit I am surprised both Cleveland Guardians manager Stephen Vogt and Milwaukee Brewers skipper Pat Murphy were named AL and NL Managers of the Year, respectively.
While both Vogt and Murphy led their clubs to divisional titles in the first year as full-fledged big-league managers, I think the AL and NL honors should have gone to Matt Quatraro of the Kansas City Royals and New York Mets skipper Carlos Mendoza, respectively.
The Royals had a 30-win improvement in 2024 going from 106 losses to an AL Wild Card berth making their first post-season appearance since their 2015 World Series triumph. No one was predicting October baseball for the Royals this year. The fact that they did speaks well of Quatraro. Although the Guardians certainly exceeded expectations this season, the Royals had a far steeper climb in the AL Central.
Meanwhile, Mendoza had the unenviable task of replacing Buck Showalter, a manager with more than 1700 career wins under his belt. While it's true that Vogt was in a similar situation in Cleveland succeeding Terry Francona, he had built his reputation as a player. Mendoza had been part of the New York Yankees coaching staff but had not managed in any capacity since 2012.
When Mendoza was hired a year ago, the press was lamenting that the team did not nab Craig Counsell, the longtime Brewers manager who jumped ship to the Chicago Cubs and was replaced by Murphy. While Murphy faced some challenges, the Brewers did repeat as NL Central champions. By contrast, the Mets were one of baseball's most disappointing teams in 2023 and Mendoza made them a force again.
Alas, the BBWAA saw it differently.
Monday, November 18, 2024
Who Will Be The Better Pitcher Going Forward? Luis Gil or Paul Skenes?
Today, New York Yankees starting pitcher Luis Gil won the 2024 AL Rookie of the Year honors while Pittsburgh Pirates phenom Paul Skenes won the 2024 NL Rookie of the Year Award.
This marks the first time two starting pitchers have won Rookie of the Year honors in both leagues since 1981 when Dave Righetti won AL Rookie of the Year with the Yankees while the late Los Angeles Dodgers legend Fernando Valenzuela won NL Rookie of the Year honors (as well as the NL Cy Young Award).
After cups of coffee with the Bronx Bombers in 2021 and 2022, Gil had a breakthrough campaign going 15-7 with a 3.50 ERA in 29 starts. Gil fanned 171 batters in 151.2 innings pitched though he did lead the AL in walks with 77. Still, Gil was an integral part of the Yankees AL championship this past season.
Meanwhile, Skenes was just about the only thing Pirates fans had to cheer about in 2024. In 23 starts, Skenes went 11-3 with a 1.96 ERA fanning 170 batters in 133 innings pitched. Skenes might have won the ERA title but was 29 innings short of eligibility. Skenes was also the NL starting pitcher in the 2024 MLB All-Star Game.
The question is who the better pitcher from will be here on out.
I'm sure conventional wisdom would be on Skenes as he reached MLB less than a year after being the number one pick in the 2023 MLB draft. At 22, Skenes hasn't reached his ceiling. Gil, 26, has been a pro for almost 10 years since he signed with the Minnesota Twins out of the Dominican Republic before joining the Yankees organization in 2018.
Of course, a lot of it has to do with health. Gil missed much of 2022 and all of 2023 due to Tommy John surgery. Will this be in Skenes' future as well?
At least for the foreseeable future, Gil and Skenes will loom large in respective pitching plans of the New York Yankees and the Pittsburgh Pirates.
Three Reasons Why Mike Johnson Won't Release The House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
House Speaker Mike Johnson has come under fire for refusing to release the House Ethics Committee Report on Matt Gaetz who abruptly resigned from Congress last week after being appointed as Attorney General by President-elect Donald Trump. Gaetz's appointment was announced shortly before report was to be released.
Johnson has come under scrutiny for his decision by Fox News anchor Shannon Bream and Senate Republicans such as Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin who want the House to share the report with the Senate.
But I suspect Johnson isn't going to budge for three reasons.
First, Johnson wishes to do President-elect Trump's bidding. Trump wants retribution, and he wants Gaetz to dish out that retribution and Johnson isn't about to cross him. I mean Johnson wants to continue to tag along with Trump's entourage at UFC events. I also think Johnson knows that Senate Republicans, whatever their concerns about Gaetz, aren't going to want to be on Trump's bad side either and will eventually back down. Johnson just does a better job at playing the role of a quisling.
Second, Johnson wouldn't be Speaker if Gaetz hadn't engineered Kevin McCarthy's ouster earlier this year while pouring cold water on Marjorie Taylor Greene's subsequent attempt to oust Johnson only months later. Is it any wonder that Johnson called Gaetz "one of the brightest minds of Washington or anywhere"?
Finally, Johnson has no desire to release the report because no good can come of it for Republicans. Word has it the report contains witness accounts of Gaetz having sex with minors. The release of the report will make Gaetz even more of a scuzzball than he already is and will reflect poorly on Johnson's leadership.
This is what happens when you have a Speaker of the House who is answerable to Donald Trump rather than to the American people and our Constitution.
Sunday, November 17, 2024
Winnipeg Blue Bombers Lose 3rd Consecutive Grey Cup Championship Game
Saturday, November 16, 2024
Who is Trump's Worst Cabinet Pick?
President-elect Donald Trump has spent the past week making appointments to the White House and the cabinet.
Several of these appointments have dropped jaws, raised eyebrows and caused hands to smack foreheads. Here are the five which stand out the most.
Secretary of Homeland Security - South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem
Secretary of Defense - FOX News personality Pete Hegseth
Director of National Intelligence - Former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard
Attorney General - Former Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz
Secretary of Health and Human Services - Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Noem is more knowledgeable about killing dogs than she is about homeland security. Hegseth served in uniform, but the Pentagon doesn't trust him as far as they can throw him. Gabbard is a pro-Assad apologist and a Russian asset who cannot be trusted with anything. Gaetz is more practiced at plying teenaged girls with drink than he is at practicing law and his appointment has made Republicans cringe though they are likely to go along with whatever Daddy Donald says.
But I think the RFK, Jr. pick is the worst of them all. There is reason to believe that he would see fit to ban all vaccines and with it we can give a warm welcome to measles, mumps, polio and perhaps even smallpox. With RFK, Jr. as HHS Secretary, America could see a death toll which surpasses that of COVID-19.
This isn't to say that Trump's "conventional" picks couldn't do their share of damage. Future Secretary of State Marco Rubio could broker Ukraine's surrender to Russia and, with it, an invitation to Russia to march across Europe killing millions more people.
Still, the fact remains that RFK, Jr. is the worst of a bad bunch as he has claimed COVID was invented to spare the Chinese and Ashkenazi Jews, that chemicals in water makes people gay and HIV does not cause AIDS.
But this is what America wanted and now we're going to get it and get it good.
Thursday, November 14, 2024
Vigil Planned for Hamas Leader Sinwar in Mississauga, Ontario as Mayor Compares Him to Nelson Mandela
I just want to point out — and I’m not being facetious — Nelson Mandela was declared a terrorist by the United States of America until the year 2008. Your terrorist and somebody else’s terrorist may be two different things.
Good grief.
Nelson Mandela never organized a massacre of civilians in South Africa or held people in captivity. Sinwar is a man who uttered, "We support the eradication of Israel through armed Jihad and struggle. This is our doctrine."
For her part, Parrish is claiming she did not compare the two. So why mention Mandela at all?
It must be remembered that Parrish spent nearly two decades as a Liberal MP earning headlines when in 2003 during the runup to the War in Iraq she shouted, "Damn Americans! I hate those bastards." Over the next year, Parrish frequently criticized then President George W. Bush and eventually stomped on a doll bearing his likeness on the CBC comedy show This Hour Has 22 Minutes. Not long thereafter, she was expelled from the party caucus by then Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin after she turned her ire on him and on the government.
She remained as an independent MP until 2006 when she turned her attention to municipal politics serving as a city councilor in Mississauga before becoming mayor earlier this year after her predecessor Bonnie Crombie resigned to become leader of the Ontario Liberal Party.
Before Parrish earned her notoriety, she also gained a reputation for being virulently anti-Israel. In June 2002, Parrish led a parliamentary delegation to Gaza and the West Bank sponsored by Palestine House. Parrish concluded that Israel's conduct was "a crime against humanity." It is also worth noting that Palestine House has its own troubling history of anti-Semitism.
In view of these facts, it is fair to say, despite her protests, that she truly believes Yahya Sinwar is the Palestinian equivalent to Nelson Mandela.
Anti-Semitism flourishes in civil society when the likes of "leaders" like Mississauga Mayor Carolyn Parrish turn a blind eye and glorify Hamas.
Monday, November 11, 2024
After Winning a World Series Ring with the Dodgers, Clayton McCullough Has His Work Cut for Him with the Marlins
The Miami Marlins have hired Clayton McCullough to be their new skipper succeeding Skip Schumaker who resigned after two seasons in the dugout.
McCullough, who turns 45 next month, has spent the past 10 seasons with the Los Angeles Dodgers earning a World Series ring as the team's first base coach, a role he had been in since 2021. Prior to 2021, McCullough served as the organization's minor league field coordinator. From 2006 to 2014, McCullough managed in the Toronto Blue Jays' organization. Drafted by the Cleveland Indians in 2002, he spent four seasons as a minor league catcher.
The new skipper will have his work cut for him. McCullough goes from a World Series champion to a team that lost 100 games this past season. While I'm sure he doesn't expect to win right away in Miami, there will be a big adjustment to make.
What's not clear is the terms of McCullough's contract? How long is his leash? Or in the case of the Marlins, the hook?
It is worth noting that McCullough was not the Marlins' first choice. The team was set to offer the position to Cleveland Guardians bench coach Craig Albernaz who abruptly withdrew his name from consideration opting to remain in Cleveland. Albernaz had a working relationship with both Peter Bendix, President of Baseball Operations and Assistant GM Gabe Kapler with the Tampa Bay Rays and San Francisco Giants, respectively, but clearly saw some red flags. Did those red flags come in the form of Marlins' owner Bruce Sherman who has overseen the departure of both Derek Jeter and Kim Ng. How long will it be before Bendix and Kapler are pushed out the door?
But perhaps McCullough is willing to take a risk with the Marlins because who knows if he gets another chance to manage in the big leagues. Albernaz might have calculated that something else will come his way. McCullough may have decided not to take that chance and jump in the shark infested waters which contain the Miami Marlins.
Sunday, November 10, 2024
A Message to Those Thinking of Heading to Canada Because of Trump's Imminent Return to the White House
Friday, November 8, 2024
I Have a Feeling The Anti-Semitic Violence in Amsterdam Will Soon Come to America
Wednesday, November 6, 2024
Harris Was a Great Candidate But Trump Won The Election The Moment Biden Was Forced to Drop Out
On Monday, the day before the election, I wrote there were three possible outcomes to the 2024 U.S. Presidential election - good, bad and ugly.
The good outcome was Kamala Harris winning and being sworn in as President on January 20, 2025.
The bad outcome was Kamala Harris winning but Congress and the courts or some combination thereof seeing to it that Donald Trump was declared the victor.
The ugly outcome was Donald Trump winning yet again despite his words, deeds and criminal behavior.
America chose ugly.
Yet the choice, however ugly, was made loud and clear. Trump won the popular vote (50.9% as of this writing) while making significant gains among Hispanics, Asians and African American males while also making inroads with both Jews and Muslims although making a point of not thanking Jewish voters.
Be that as it may, Trump regained all that he lost save for Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District. Trump won Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and will gain Nevada. These are cold facts.
Kamala Harris was a great candidate, and I am proud to have voted for her and Tim Walz. I think Harris and Walz would have been good for America.
But I think Trump won the election the moment President Biden was forced to withdraw from the race.
Consider what I wrote on June 28th - a day after Biden's disastrous debate against Trump:
Today, there is a huge clamor for President Biden to drop out of the race.
After Trump was convicted of 34 felonies did anyone call upon him to step aside as the Republican nominee?
No one.
So, could someone please explain to me why one bad debate is worse than being a convicted felon?
Because in calling for Biden to step aside we're basically being told that none of his achievements matter over the past three and a half years matter be it the vaccine rollout, infrastructure legislation, Medicare negotiating drug prices, student loan relief, the Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPS and Science Act and the short-lived Child Tax Credit.
The best that I can explain is that we have no standards of behavior and that style triumphs over substance.
When Biden bowed out on July 21st, I wrote, "The efforts of Democrats to change horses in midstream is a risky proposition that is more likely to fail than it is to succeed."
Alas, the gambit has failed.
Again, it is not a reflection against Harris. After all, the impetus of pushing out Biden was his poor debate performance against Trump. By contrast, Harris had a wonderful debate against Trump in September and was widely perceived as the winner of that debate.
And yet Harris' excellent debate against Trump didn't matter one iota. A majority of American voters chose Trump, who at that very same debate, claimed Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio were eating cats and dogs.
When we're more forgiving of a man who is an unpunished convicted criminal than a man who broke no laws but had a bad night on the debate stage while governing this country in good faith then we have asked for trouble and Trump will be more than happy to oblige in giving it to us.
Let's reflect on that during the last 75 days of American democracy.
Monday, November 4, 2024
The 2024 U.S. Presidential Election - The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
At this time 24 hours from now, results will be coming in for the 2024 U.S. elections with all eyes on the outcome of the presidential election between current Vice-President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump.
It might take several days for the results to be clear perhaps longer depending on the outcome. But from where I sit the results of the presidential election will be good, bad or ugly.
Good
The only good outcome of the presidential election is a Kamala Harris victory.
In this case, victory entails Harris surviving shenanigans by Trump and his quislings to overturn the will of the people and be inaugurated as the 47th President of the United States on January 20, 2025. Should this come to pass let us also hope there will be no attempt by Trump and his quislings to overthrow the Harris Administration.
It must be said that good isn't perfect. Harris will be constrained both by Congress of which one at least House controlled by Republicans and a conservative Supreme Court. I will also invariably disagree with some of the things a Harris Administration will say and do. Should I be dissatisfied with Harris' stewardship then it is quite possible that come 2028, I might choose a different President. But this is exactly what democracy ought to be.
Kamala Harris isn't entitled to my vote in four years from now, but she has earned it this year. She has earned it by seeking to help others rather seeking retribution for oneself.
Bad
A bad outcome would be a Harris victory which Congress fails to certify and sees fit to choose Trump with the Supreme Court bestowing its blessing. Should Congress and the Supreme Court see fit to disregard the free choice of the American people then we shall cease to be a democracy.
One could argue this isn't the first time this has come to pass with Bush vs. Gore in 2000. But Bush did not stay in power for life and was widely praised for his efforts towards a smooth transition to the Obama Administration.
Should Trump return to power by dubious means then all bets are off because we would truly be in uncharted territory. Above all else, do not expect Trump to surrender power willingly. Indeed, this scenario would invariably result in massive protests which a second Trump Administration would crush mercilessly.
There are those such as David French who does not believe that any effort by Trump to overturn the election will end in failure. But that doesn't mean he won't try and as long as he tries one cannot discount the possibility he might succeed.
Ugly
An ugly outcome would be a Trump win.
It would be ugly because Trump has made it loud and clear that he is seeking retribution. When I heard Trump say he'd be a dictator on day one, I understood it to be his intention to suspend the Constitution. Should this come to pass, and it survives judicial challenges, then Trump is free to jail and execute his enemies real and imagined, restrict the First Amendment by shutting down the free press, and make himself President-for-Life.
If a second Trump terms results in Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, the Obamas, the Clintons, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Liz Cheney being imprisoned and/or executed for treason then none of us are safe. What consequences would I face from a second Trump Administration for posting these thoughts? Would I lose the job I worked so hard to earn? Or would I lose a great deal more than that?
What makes this truly ugly is that we will have freely chosen this path with no hope of going back. There are a great many Trump supporters who despise immigrants, look down upon women and LGBTQ persons and cannot countenance any viewpoint contrary to their own. These are people who are sick of democracy and want to try something else.
I also believe there are Trump supporters who are still convinced that he is more bark than bite. I should mention I have come across those who loathe Trump as much as I do who are not convinced that he will become a dictator. Over the weekend, I was having dinner with one such anti-Trump friend who after reading Tim Alberta's article in The Atlantic about the chaos at the now infamous Madison Square Garden rally is convinced that Trump is too stupid to be a dictator.
At this stage, we can ill-afford to underestimate Trump whatever the outcome of the election. Let us remember that Trump tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power once. If we reject him again, Trump won't take no for an answer and try once more.
But if he wins then the gloves are off. The Supreme Court has basically told him he can do whatever the hell he wants. So why wouldn't he? The only way not to answer that question is to not give Trump another chance.
Conclusion
For the moment, America still has a choice, and we can still choose a good outcome. Yet it is possible that we can make the right choice, and it might not be enough to prevent nefarious forces from imposing an outcome not of our choosing. Or we might see fit to burn it all down.
It remains to be seen which door America will choose to open. I can only we choose the door which won't lock behind us.
Sunday, November 3, 2024
On Being Promoted
I wish to share some good news. Tomorrow, I will begin my duties as a Records Lead at the law firm where I work in Boston's Seaport District.
What this will mean is that I will be involved in billing with our vendors, approving time sheets and supervising records personnel here in Boston as well as in our offices in Los Angeles and in San Francisco.
It remains to be seen if I will be visiting those offices, but I'm sure that could be a possibility down the road. Should this come to pass, it would mark the first time I've ever set foot in California. At the very minimum, I will need to familiarize myself with California labor law which is even more generous for employees than Massachusetts. Of course, I will also be attending a lot more meetings and mandatory trainings. But this will come with better compensation.
To say that my return to Boston in May 2021 has proved to be fortuitous would be an understatement. Consider what I wrote in my year-end postmortem on December 31, 2022:
For me, 2022 was my best year in many years. Dare I say perhaps the best year of my life.I say this in great part because I spent the entire year back in the Boston-Cambridge-Somerville area after having moved thrice between 2018 and 2021. Simply put I am where I want to be.I also say this because I am in my best employment situation in a decade. It is the first time in a long time where I have been in an environment people where rely on me and where my knowledge and judgment is respected and valued. Granted my position is relatively low on the totem pole but someone has to keep the totem pole sturdy.
Since writing that entry I have continued to maintain the trust of my managers and while building stronger relationships in the firm. Because of this I have now climbed the totem pole a few rungs but remain close enough to the ground to keep things steady.
Of course, there will be a period of adjustment. How long this adjustment will take remains to be seen. We will be hiring a new Records Associate to take over the position that I hold now in a month's time. It will take time to get him fully acclimated into the scheme of things as well. Fortunately, my managers are patient and understanding. This is key as this is far from a given in many workplaces.
As the law firm in based in Boston, there is always much work to be done. But better to be busy than not. There are far worse things with which I could be occupying my time.
While I am confident that I will succeed in my new role, I am not without some nervousness in the recesses of my mind. Last night, I dreamed I was working in a grocery store where I was promoted only to have all of my work questioned and delegitimized before I awoke.
Such worries are only natural. However, I do have a strong base of support at work and have no reason to believe this will change for the foreseeable future.
I suspect most people don't seek out to become a Records Clerk. When I lived in Ottawa, I spent 2½ years as a Records Clerk with what was then known as Revenue Canada. At the time, I was also working on my MA at Carleton University part-time. My ambition was to attain political work of some sort preferably with an elected official or in some capacity with the NDP. Aside from some internships with several NDP MPs and my involvement with the late Alexa McDonough's successful NDP leadership campaign in 1995, I never went far down this path as I had hoped. I did have some job interviews with a couple of NDP MPs, but nothing ever came of it.
When I got laid off from Revenue Canada late in 1999, I set my sights on finding political work in the U.S. Indeed, when I moved to Boston nearly 25 years ago it was as an organizer for the now defunct ACORN. This position lasted all of two weeks.
During my early years in Boston, I worked several jobs in the non-profit sector for a child abuse hotline and later in the vocational rehabilitation field. This did not prove successful either. While I was decent at these jobs, I generally found the working environment to be toxic and unfriendly.
In late 2003, I found myself working as a Records Clerk once more this time for an insurance company in Boston's Financial District. Until my current position, this was my most successful undertaking as I worked in this role for nearly a decade before getting laid off. I spent a couple of years as a floater before starting to work as Records Clerk in a law firm environment for the first time a decade ago.
During this period, now with a more conservative outlook, I was also contributing articles to The American Spectator earning extra money. I was hoping to parlay this into other ventures. Although my articles would occasionally get mentioned elsewhere and I did a few radio interviews, most of the satisfaction I received was seeing my name online. Of course, I would stop contributing to The American Spectator when Bob Tyrrell told me to stop criticizing Donald Trump. It is a decision I have never regretted. Although I contributed some articles to National Review Online and a single article to The Forward while I was in Atlanta, my writing these days is confined to this space.
I did attain a Paralegal Certificate from Boston University in 2016 resulting in paralegal work as a contractor for HHS for about a year before that came to an abrupt end. After a lengthy period of unemployment, I found myself back as a Records Clerk with another Boston law firm before transferring to New York six months later for yet another Records Clerk job with a different law firm. Then along came COVID which resulted in me losing that job along with millions of other Americans. Seven months later, I made my way to Atlanta for my first Records Lead position only to return to Boston seven months later.
Amid all the tumult, I came to accept that I am a Records Clerk and that it was a specialty I could take all over the country but has been put to its best use here in Boston. I have paid my dues and am finally being rewarded for it. This has been a long time coming and it has finally arrived.
Of course, there are no guarantees. We are 48 hours away from a presidential election. Should we see fit to return Donald Trump to the White House, the future of the United States and the world changes irrevocably on both the macro and micro level. If Jeff Bezos can kill a Washington Post editorial endorsing Kamala Harris to stay in good standing with Trump, then what could happen to a Records Clerk with a blog, however obscure, which is less than complimentary to the Orange One?
Well, I will cross that bridge should it come. At this point, I can only deal with the things with which I have some measure of control and as long as I can do that then this promotion will be a success. With that, I look forward to tomorrow.