Maine Democrats Stand with The Swastika

 

It's official. Maine Democrats have chosen to stand with the swastika.

With just under 45% of the vote counted, Graham Platner has won the Democratic Party nomination and will face off against Republican incumbent Susan Collins in the U.S. Senate race in November.

As of this writing, Platner has earned 71.6% versus 19.9% of the vote for sitting Governor Janet Mills who suspended her campaign in April.

With each passing day, Democrats are turning out to be every bit as bad as MAGA in descending to nominate candidates beneath the bottom of the barrel.

There was a time not so long ago that voters would have shunned Platner and not given him the time of day.

But those days are gone. Today, people want easy answers and if that means nominating someone who not only sports a Nazi tattoo but proclaims to be "a longtime fan" of a white supremacist then no problem.

This is a consequence of now having virtually no living persons who have first-hand knowledge of the horror of the Nazis. For far too many people, the Nazis are anyone who they see as bad and for far too many Democrats, it is Israel and Jews who are bad.

Of course, there are those who believe Platner when he claims he had no knowledge of his tattoo's Nazi provenance. But as Guy Benson from the Washington Examiner points out this is rubbish:

Platner has recently stated that he was “appalled” to learn of his tattoo’s Nazi symbolism, explaining that he simply thought it was a cool-looking, generic skull and crossbones. There’s just one minor problem with this spin: It’s demonstrably untrue. A CNN investigation found that Platner acknowledged the Nazi connection for years, in private conversations and online postings. The article cites two acquaintances who confirm that Platner spoke about the Nazi connotations years before the present controversy.

Add to the mix Platner’s own former campaign manager, who quit working for him and refused to sign a lucrative nondisclosure agreement. “Graham has an antisemitic tattoo on his chest,” she wrote in a social media post, and “he knows damn well what it means.” Again, that is the woman who was running his campaign. Platner chose his Nazi tattoo, lied about his Nazi tattoo, apologized for and covered up his Nazi tattoo (upon “discovering” what it was), then effectively un-apologized for it when he realized his core supporters either don’t care or affirmatively love it. Apropos of nothing, Platner has also become an obsessive and virulent critic of Israel, the world’s lone, tiny Jewish state, a prerequisite for “progressive” adoration these days. 

It is a frightening thought that Democratic voters in Maine know full well that Platner sports a Nazi tattoo and either don't care or they are down with it because they don't like Israel and care precious little for Jews. Whatever the case, these voters have chosen to stand with the swastika.

Now that Platner is the Democratic Party standard-bearer in Maine, I can only hope there a sufficient number of Republicans, independents along with those Democrats who voted for Janet Mills who will give Susan Collins one more term in the Senate. 

Spencer Pratt is an Entitled MAGA Brat

There are some people you know that exist by way of osmosis. 

This is the case with Spencer Pratt, the now failed LA mayoral candidate.

Although I would never watch a nanosecond of the MTV reality series The Hills, I was aware that Heidi and Spencer existed and was ashamed that of that scant tidbit of knowledge.

With a culture as disposable as a diaper, these people would eventually recede into the recesses of my mind. 

Well, that is until very recently when Pratt launched his mayoral bid. With 98.5% of the ballots counted, Pratt did earn more than 25% of the vote but not quite enough to advance to the November runoff with incumbent mayor Karen Bass and her DSA challenger Nithya Raman who have earned 34.3% and 29% of the vote, respectively. 

Pratt didn't do badly but like most reality show villains, he was in it to win it. While ostensibly an independent, Pratt was endorsed by President Trump. And because Pratt didn't win, Trump and MAGA are claiming the vote was rigged. 

Trump and Pratt are cut from the same cloth. They are both grifters who believe they are entitled to public office and the largesse which comes with it. Pratt is little more than a MAGA brat.

Putting Pratt's MAGA allegiance to the side, why would Los Angelinos vote for a candidate who threatened to move out of the city if he wasn't elected its mayor?

That demonstrates Pratt didn't care about the city. He cared only for his own prestige.

In which case, don't be surprised if Pratt packs his bags for Florida.

Nevertheless, the LA mayoral race does concern me. I am not thrilled with the possibility that both New York and Los Angeles could have anti-Semitic socialist mayors. Raman is yet another one of these DSA folks who define their progressivism by using words like "apartheid" and "genocide" to describe Israel while palling around with the Hasan Pikers of the world. 

With that said, the LA mayoral race is not as bleak as the Texas Senate race. If I resided in Los Angeles, I would have no trouble casting a ballot for Bass. I can hope a plurality of LA voters will also have no such troubles.

Thoughts on Trump's Temper Tantrum & Walking Out on His Interview with Kristen Welker

 

I would be remiss if I didn't offer a brief comment concerning President Trump's temper tantrum in which he walked out of an interview with NBC Meet the Press host Kristen Welker. The conversation took place in Wisconsin on Friday but aired on Sunday. 

Trump's nerves were frayed as the interview was interrupted by rain and audio issues. But Welker hit a raw nerve when she asked Trump about the apparently abandoned anti-weaponization fund. Trump refused to answer Welker's question as to whether J6ers who assaulted Capitol police officers should receive compensation. Trump then claimed the FBI had invited the J6ers into the Capitol. Welker told him he had no evidence and reminded him that many of the J6ers had pled guilty. Trump said the J6ers were scared and then went on a rant about the California gubernatorial election being rigged and his 2020 election loss being rigged. When Welker wouldn't have it, Trump called her "stupid" and "crooked" and soon walked off the set. You can read the transcript here.

Prior to Trump, the idea of a sitting U.S. President storming out of an interview like a toddler would have been inconceivable. He is not a well man. Unfortunately, given the fact that we gave him a second chance at the White House after January 6th indicates that we are not well either.

While many Americans are appalled and embarrassed by Trump's behavior, there are also many Americans who are delighted with what Trump did today especially considering that his interlocutor is a woman and a person of color. 

Of course, we have short memories and selective ones at that. In a week from now, hardly anyone will remember Trump did this just as hardly anyone remembers Trump telling the world he was glad that Robert Mueller had died.

Perhaps we elected the President we deserve.

NY Dem Congressional Candidate Endorsed by Mamdani Defends Presence at Pro-Hamas Rally Day After October 7th

 

Darializa Avila Chevalier, who is challenging incumbent Congressman Adriano Espaillat for the Democratic Party nomination in NY's 13th Congressional District and has received the endorsement of NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, has defended her participation in a pro-Hamas march in New York City the day after the October 7th attacks.

Chevalier claims that she partook in the pro-Hamas march for "the human rights of Palestinians." This was the infamous march in which participants chanted, “Resistance is justified when people are occupied”. There were also chants of "700" in reference to the number of Israelis killed during the attack at the time with others making throat slitting gestures. Perhaps this was Chevalier's way of supporting the human rights of Palestinians. Perhaps Chevalier's presence at this pro-Hamas march is why Mamdani endorsed her.

After all, Congressman Espaillat had endorsed Mamdani, but Mamdani did not reciprocate. Like President Trump, Mamdani demands loyalty but don't count on him to share his loyalty in return.

The 13th Congressional District covers Upper Manhattan and parts of the Bronx and is predominantly Hispanic. As one of the safest Democratic congressional districts in the country, if Chevalier supplants Espaillat for the nomination she will invariably be elected to Congress. 

Electing someone who participated in a pro-Hamas march to Congress is every bit as despicable as electing someone who stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6th. While Democrats are right to decry the election of J6ers to Congress their credibility is in question if they turn a blind eye to candidates who support Hamas and the murder of Jewish civilians in Israel.

If Democrats are smart, they will pull out all the stops to ensure Espaillat's nomination. 

Unfortunately given Democratic support for the likes of Graham Platner, Adam Hamawy, Abdul El-Sayed and, for that matter, Mamdani, I cannot be assured where it concerns their intelligence.

Farage, Musk & Vance Do Not Care About Henry Nowak or His Family

In recent days, violence has broken out in the UK following the release of video recorded in December 2025 showing an 18-year-old man named Henry Nowak being arrested in the last moments of his life while protesting that he had been stabbed.

In fact, Nowak had been stabbed by one Vickrum Digwa, a Sikh man who falsely accused Nowak of committing a racist attack against him. Digwa was subsequently tried for Nowak's murder and will spend the rest of his life in prison.

Unfortunately, the release of the Nowak video has resulted in violence against police and attacks against members of the U.K. Sikh community despite Digwa's conviction and sentence.

Never one to miss an opportunity, UK Reform Leader Nigel Farage, Elon Musk and U.S. Vice-President JD Vance have seen fit to add fuel to the flames despite pleas from the Nowak family to refrain from doing exactly that. 

While Farage has praised Nowak's family for handling this "in the most extraordinarily dignified way", he has failed to muster any dignity of his own. Farage called upon the public to respond with "pure, cold rage." The result has been violence against police and the Sikh community. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's AI platform Grok has wrongly identified the officers involved in Nowak's arrest forcing these officers into hiding.

Perhaps most disgustingly of all, VP Vance has claimed that Nowak's murder is a result of "a mass invasion of immigrants." Vickrum Digwa is responsible for Henry Nowak's death, not the Sikh community. Most Sikhs manage to go through life without stabbing someone to death. No one in the U.K. Sikh community condones Nowak's death. Why would they?

Of course, Vance (as well as Farage and Musk) knows this but why let a crisis go to waste? They have chosen to stoke violence against the authorities and are willfully promoting hatred against the Sikh community instead of engaging in constructive measures like improving police training or reforming the U.K.'s knife laws.

In so doing, not only have Farage, Musk and Vance demonstrated how little they care for public order and the Sikh community, but they have also demonstrated how little they care for Henry Nowak and his family. They have wronged Henry Nowak every bit as much as the man who killed him and the police who neglected to care for him.

Carney Cannot Address Anti-Semitism in Canada By Appointing Anti-Semites

Last Monday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney gave an address concerning the surge of anti-Semitism in Canada at Holy Blossom Temple in Toronto:

Carney admitted that "Canada's civic compact is failing Jewish Canadians."

In an effort to address this failure, Carney announced the establishment of a Ministerial Advisory Council on Rights, Equality, and Inclusion.

However, Carney appointed two members who will do little to address Canadian anti-Semitism. Indeed, their presence will very likely exacerbate it.

One of the members appointed by Carney is Omar Alghabra, a former Liberal cabinet minister and onetime President of the Canadian Arab Federation, has publicly questioned whether Hamas, Hezbollah and the al-Aqsa Martyr Brigades are terrorist organizations and intend to destroy Israel. It is worth noting that Alghabra also publicly refused to condemn the October 7th attacks.

Carney has also appointed Avish Nanda, an attorney who is representing those (including two Palestinian students) who organized an encampment at the University of Alberta at Edmonton back in 2024. Nanda will attempt to argue that the dismantlement of the encampment is a violation of the Canadian Charter of Freedom. 

Let us remember that the surge in anti-Semitism in Canada (and indeed the world over) began on October 7, 2023, a day that saw more Jews killed since the end of WWII. Yet Alghabra refuses to condemn the attack while Nanda represents those who support Hamas.

If Mark Carney were serious about ending the scourge of anti-Semitism in Canada, he would not have appointed such scoundrels to a committee intended to combat it.

NJ Dem Congressional Candidate Hamawy Has "No Regret" For Support of Blind Sheikh Responsible for '93 WTC Attack

Last Tuesday, Dr. Adam Hamawy won the Democratic Party primary in New Jersey's 12th Congressional District.

This development is troubling to former world chess champion and Russian dissident Garry Kasparov:

Hamawy’s most alarming attribute is his affiliation with the late Omar Abdel-Rahman, the so-called “Blind Sheikh” convicted for his role in a series of terrorist plots following an investigation into the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing.

Hamawy stood by Rahman when the latter proclaimed his innocence in the aftermath of the February ‘93 attack, and later served as a defense witness for the infamous Sheikh.

Why does this matter? As a moral question, if Democrats are going to condemn Republicans for instigating chaos and political violence, they ought to be consistent. There would be much justified outrage if a Republican candidate was found to have been involved in January 6—OK, unsurprisingly, several Republican candidates actually have been insurrectionists, and I think most readers of The Next Move recognize this as a bad thing.

You might say Hamawy was young, misguided. Yet, of his association with Rahman, Hamawy recently told one journalist: “I don’t know how I could have regret.”

One need only look at Hamawy’s closing rally to see how little he has changed since the heady days of the early 1990s. The rally headliners included pro-China “Orthodox Jews are inbred” streamer Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb, a Pennsylvania congressional nominee who shared a social media post describing the massacre of Jews at Bondi Beach, Australia as a Zionist false flag. (Rabb’s claim that the post was the work of a rogue staffer doesn’t pass the smell test.)

This is not someone who has seriously reckoned with extremism. You can tell a lot about a person by the company that they keep, and it is fair game to question Hamawy’s judgment and worldview accordingly.

Hamawy made the comment about having "no regret" concerning his association with Blind Sheikh,  in a recent profile of him by Tom Moran of the Philadelphia Inquirer: 

But his association with the Blind Sheik deserves a careful look. According to testimony at the 1995 trial, the sheikh was openly advocating terrorism during the period Hamawy was following him, preaching that Muslims have a duty to attack Americans, along with Jews of any nationality. This was a genuinely bad guy, on par with leaders of the Ku Klux Klan.

Hamawy concedes he personally heard the sheikh advocate violence. “He did speak about violent things that I think most people disagree with and most people condemn, including myself,” he told me. “But it wasn’t the only thing he spoke about.”

But what drew him to the sheikh in the first place? And why did he stick with him, even after the bombing?

I sat with Hamawy for an hour at his West Windsor, N.J., office, where he now practices plastic surgery, and I got no clean answers.

Why didn’t he object when the sheikh advocated violence? “I was a young man,” Hamawy said. “I wasn’t like a large person in the community to go up and talk to them, you know?”

Why did he stand with the sheikh at that April news conference? “He was a well-known figure in the community at the time. There were many people there.”

Why did he join the sheikh at a conference on Islamic economics in Detroit, sitting with him in a van for 13 hours? “From what I remember, it was a last-minute carpool. I was in there with several community members.”

Does he regret his association with the sheikh? “Yes, I mean, I regret not saying something. Again, I condemn the violence … But I didn’t do anything wrong, so I don’t know how I could have regret.”

Hmmm.

Hmmn, indeed. 

Hamawy concedes he heard the Blind Sheikh advocate violence, but stated that the Blind Sheikh said other things too.

What other things could the Blind Sheikh could have persuaded Hamawy to remain by his side if he truly abhors and condemns violence against civilians?

Absent an unconditional contrition of his association with the Blind Sheikh and unequivocal condemnation of the bloodshed the Blind Sheikh caused, Mr. Hamawy is unfit to serve in Congress and represents a danger to our national security.

The 1993 attack on the World Trade Center claimed the lives of six people and would inspire al-Qaeda to attack the WTC yet again just over 8 years later with far more calamitous results.

It is true that there is no evidence to suggest that Hamawy was directly involved in the 1993 attack. Nevertheless, the fact that he has stood by the Blind Sheikh for more than three decades makes him part of the problem where it concerns attacks against American civilians by terrorists inspired by Islamic fundamentalism.