During a rally in Youngstown, Ohio last night, President Trump made some revealing comments concerning the War in Iran which are worthy of both discussion and derision.
Trump's commentary on Iran is being overshadowed by his egging on violence by his supporters against a female protester (not without justification) and his fawning over Senator Jon Husted's ass. That I could have gone my whole life without being the wiser.
Regarding Iran, Trump specifically commented on killing its leaders and having regrets about having done so:
We might have gone too far with the leaders because we don’t know who the hell we’re dealing with anymore.
For starters, it is clear to Trump that his decision to engage in a military action against Iran has harmed his standing and may very well lead to Republican losing both Houses in next month's mid-terms. Voters disapprove of Trump's handling of the Iran War by a 2:1 margin.
Yet at the same time, Trump completely misses the mark.
Mind you, this is hardly a surprise. Where it concerns in Iran, he has gone from calling on the people of Iran to take back their government to claiming that regime change has been achieved and then saying he never cared about regime change in the first place. If one was going to commit to a military action against the Iranian regime, Trump is the worst possible President to have in the White House.
His statement in Youngstown is predicated on the premises that Iran's existing regime continues as an Islamic Republic. Yet let us not forget there has been popular discontent against the regime for years including in the months prior to the war. As I argued prior to military action:
From where I sit nearly 6,000 miles away from Tehran, I believe the best possible outcome would be if the regime were to collapse by the sheer force of popular revolt from within and for Iranians to determine their own destiny. I write this knowing full well such a thing is unlikely to happen without the aid of external actors.
That external help could have come in the form of covert operations not only on a military level but also working closely with Iranian opposition on the ground to prepare a government in waiting. Had this opposition been successful in forcing the collapse of the Iranian regime then this opposition could have formed a provisional government.
This provisional government with technical assistance from the United States, Israel and other willing parties with the aim of establishing democracy through elections, the writing of a new constitution, granting autonomy to existing civic institutions within Iran as well as the establishment of an independent judiciary. That body would be given the task of holding leaders and members of the previous regime not killed in any military conflict to be held to account for their actions.
Of course, such things require patience, planning and precision. Unfortunately, President Trump does not possess any of these qualities.
Because of this lack of qualities and the Left's relative indifference to the fate of the Iranian people as compared to the Palestinians, Iran's regime continues to have a lifeline regardless of how many of its leaders have been killed in the course of this military campaign.






