(YouTube screenshot of Mike Rogers & Haley Stevens on November 1, 2026)
Only 48 hours before Michigan voters go to the polls, Democratic Congresswoman Haley Stevens shocked the world by publicly endorsing Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers.
Back in August, Stevens narrowly lost the Democratic Senate primary to Abdul El-Sayed but had committed to supporting him. In fact, Stevens was set to campaign with El-Sayed today but El-Sayed demanded Stevens stay away from the "unity rally" when she criticized the presence of Tucker Carlson in one of his campaign ads and his less than forceful condemnation of an anti-Semitic third-party made in support of his candidacy.
Well, Stevens took his advice to stay away and decided to endorse Rogers, something her fiancé Jason Turkish publicly did last week.
Good for her.
In the grand scheme of things, Stevens would have been better off not making any commitment to endorse El-Sayed and tried to make him earn her support. Had he failed to do so, Stevens could have endorsed Rogers earlier in the campaign and say that El-Sayed had failed to take her concerns seriously.
Of course, I say this knowing full well that any decision by Stevens to support Rogers would have been met with recriminations. As it stands, much of Stevens' staff has tendered their resignations with the chair of the Michigan Democratic Party announcing she had been expelled from the party despite the fact that she intends to vote for other Democrats on the ballot. Presumably this would include such as Michigan Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jocelyn Benson who is running against Republican Congressman John James.
As you can imagine, the Democratic Party podcastverse is absolutely aghast. While I think Pod Save America, The Bulwark and James Carville are absolutely right that Stevens has ended her political career as a Democrat, I think they are worried that Rogers is going to win.
What Stevens' late hour endorsement of Rogers does is give Jews and African Americans who normally vote Democrat a permission structure to vote for Rogers. It might not be a majority of Jewish and African American voters, but it could be enough for Rogers to defeat El-Sayed.
This is why Democrats are so angry with Stevens. If Stevens' endorsement of Rogers was of no consequence and El-Sayed had a guaranteed path towards victory, Democrats would not have such a visceral reaction.
It isn't to say that Stevens' endorsement of Rogers guarantees him victory either. But Rogers certainly has a better chance today than he did 24 hours ago.






