George H.W. Bush, the 41st President of the United States, passed away on Friday at the age of 94. Bush had been facing a myriad of health issues in recent years. With the passing of Barbara Bush, his wife of 73 years, back in April it was only a matter of time before he would leave this cruel coil of mortality.
Although Bush grew up surrounded by privilege and wealth, he grew up during a time when this did not exempt one from duty to one's country. Bush would enlist in the U.S. Navy upon graduating from Phillips Academy and become a naval aviator. He served his country with valor in the Pacific Theater earning a Distinguished Flying Cross, the Presidential Unit and three air medals after being shot down near the Bonin Islands in September 1944.
After the end of WWII, Bush spent the next two decades in the oil business which made him a wealthy man in his own right. He would also become a successful political figure in his own right and eclipse his father Prescott's political success as a Republican Senator from Connecticut building his own political base in Texas. After losing his first bid for Congress in 1964, Bush would get elected two years later and win re-election to a second term in 1968. Bush would set his sights on the U.S. Senate in 1970, but would be defeated by Lloyd Bentsen. This would not be the last time the two would square off in the political arena.
Bush would spend the 1970's in various roles - Ambassador to the UN, Chairman of the Republican National Committee, our country's first envoy to Communist China and Director of the CIA. Some resume. The resume was sufficient enough for Bush to seek the GOP nomination for President in 1980. After winning in Iowa, Bush made the critical mistake of refusing to debate the Republican field in New Hampshire and Ronald Reagan would never look back. But Reagan needed Bush and would name him as his VP running mate. The country got a taste of a Bush presidency early in Reagan's term following an assassination attempt in March 1981 despite then Secretary of State Alexander Haig's claims that he was in charge.
But being a two term VP isn't always conducive to winning the presidency. In the 1988 presidential election, Bush sought to become the first sitting VP to be elected President since Martin Van Buren in 1836. Bush would stumble in Iowa finishing behind not only Bob Dole, but Pat Robertson as well. But Bush would rebound and win over Republicans with his convention speech in which he not only said, "Read my lips: no new taxes", but spoke of "a thousand points of light" and seeking "a kinder and gentler nation." Bush would easily defeat Michael Dukakis on election night and become the 41st President of the United States.
Unfortunately, Bush could ill afford to be kind and gentle when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. Bush would assemble a coalition which would successfully drive Saddam back to Iraq less than six months later in the Gulf War. This would lead to public approval ratings of over 90%. But this would not last. With the economy in recession and deficits climbing, Bush made went back on his "no new taxes" pledge and made a deal with the Democratic controlled Congress. Many Republicans would never forgive Bush. He would see a primary challenge from former Nixon and Reagan speechwriter Pat Buchanan in the 1992 GOP primaries. During the general election, Bush would lose votes to independent billionaire candidate Ross Perot which were critical in helping Bill Clinton become the first Democrat to win the White House in nearly two decades.
Despite only serving a single term in the White House, Americans would come to have a greater appreciation of Bush's presidency and his image would gradually be rehabilitated. Even if some disagreed with Bush's decision to oust Manuel Noriega while keeping Saddam in power or appointing Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court, people respected Bush as a decent, dignified man who did not seek to make everything about himself. Such qualities are in short supply and stand in stark contrast to the Oval Office's present occupant. In that respect, George H.W. Bush was a kinder and gentler President of the United States. R.I.P.
Friday, November 30, 2018
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
Trump Supporters Use "Obama Did It" Defense For Tear Gas Use on Children
I find it rather curious that Trump supporters are defending the use of tear gas against migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border along San Diego and Tijuana because it was done during the Obama Administration back in 2013.
If conservatives believe the Obama Administration was correct in using tear gas along the border then why didn't we hear conservatives defending them at the time? Of course, conservatives were drawn to Trump because he wanted "to build a big beautiful wall" and have Mexico pay for it all the while calling Mexicans criminals and rapists.
Now I understand that Trump supporters think there is a double standard here and there is to some degree. But Trump has spent the past three years vilifying people of Mexican and Latin American origin and spent the weeks leading up to the mid-terms ranting and raving about the migrant caravan and placed a video on his Twitter feed highlighting an illegal immigrant who bragged about committing murder even though he had been previously released by former Maricopa County Sherriff Joe Arpaio. For all of Obama's numerous flaws and shortcomings, he never publicly denigrated people of Hispanic origin whether they entered the country legally or not.
Now I don't think the Obama Administration was anymore justified in using an agent outlawed in war against migrants anymore than the Trump Administration is. But for all of the claims regarding the Obama Administration's use of tear gas against migrants there is no evidence to suggest that it was deployed against children. This makes a huge difference. Because now President Trump is grasping at straws with claims that the gas used is "very safe" and that migrants were grabbing random children while crossing the border.
Make no mistake. The Trump Administration sought this confrontation and is now reaping what it was sowed.
If conservatives believe the Obama Administration was correct in using tear gas along the border then why didn't we hear conservatives defending them at the time? Of course, conservatives were drawn to Trump because he wanted "to build a big beautiful wall" and have Mexico pay for it all the while calling Mexicans criminals and rapists.
Now I understand that Trump supporters think there is a double standard here and there is to some degree. But Trump has spent the past three years vilifying people of Mexican and Latin American origin and spent the weeks leading up to the mid-terms ranting and raving about the migrant caravan and placed a video on his Twitter feed highlighting an illegal immigrant who bragged about committing murder even though he had been previously released by former Maricopa County Sherriff Joe Arpaio. For all of Obama's numerous flaws and shortcomings, he never publicly denigrated people of Hispanic origin whether they entered the country legally or not.
Now I don't think the Obama Administration was anymore justified in using an agent outlawed in war against migrants anymore than the Trump Administration is. But for all of the claims regarding the Obama Administration's use of tear gas against migrants there is no evidence to suggest that it was deployed against children. This makes a huge difference. Because now President Trump is grasping at straws with claims that the gas used is "very safe" and that migrants were grabbing random children while crossing the border.
Make no mistake. The Trump Administration sought this confrontation and is now reaping what it was sowed.
Monday, November 26, 2018
Desginating Ronald Torreyes Represents Everything That's Wrong With The Yankees UPDATE
The New York Yankees have designated utility infielder Ronald Torreyes for assignment. The versatile Venezuelan was dropped from the team's 40-man roster in favor of pitcher Parker Bridwell who was claimed off waivers from the Los Angeles Angels.
After being key player on the Yankees bench in 2016 and 2017, Torreyes was limited to 41 games in 2018 but managed to bat .280. For his efforts, Torreyes was buried in Scranton-Wilkes Barre.
Dumping Torreyes represents everything that is wrong with the Yankees philosophy. The Yankees can hit all the home runs, but without people to move the line and without bench depth there will be no World Series parade up Broadway anytime soon. Torreyes was the closest thing the Yankees had to Brock Holt. That would be the Brock Holt who hit for the cycle against the Yankees in the ALDS.
Not that I care about the Yankees. I'm all for their shortsightedness especially if it means World Series parades down Boylston Street. But I do think the diminutive Torreyes is getting the short end of the stick. Torreyes belongs on a big league roster. The problem is that he has already passed through seven big league organizations (Cincinnati Reds, Chicago Cubs, Houston Astros, Toronto Blue Jays, Los Angeles Dodgers, Los Angeles Angels and the Yankees - twice). The Yankees have treated him no differently than any of the other organizations he has passed through. I'm sure the Red Sox would take a flier on him if they didn't already have Holt. Why can't big league organizations see Torreyes' value? For God's sake, somebody at least invite him to spring training.
UPDATE: The Cubs have acquired Torreyes from the Yankees in exchange for cash or a player to be named later. Torreyes was previously in the Cubs' organization during the 2012 and 2013 seasons before being sent to the Astros' organization midway through 2013. Somehow I think Joe Maddon will find a place for him to play. Probably several.
After being key player on the Yankees bench in 2016 and 2017, Torreyes was limited to 41 games in 2018 but managed to bat .280. For his efforts, Torreyes was buried in Scranton-Wilkes Barre.
Dumping Torreyes represents everything that is wrong with the Yankees philosophy. The Yankees can hit all the home runs, but without people to move the line and without bench depth there will be no World Series parade up Broadway anytime soon. Torreyes was the closest thing the Yankees had to Brock Holt. That would be the Brock Holt who hit for the cycle against the Yankees in the ALDS.
Not that I care about the Yankees. I'm all for their shortsightedness especially if it means World Series parades down Boylston Street. But I do think the diminutive Torreyes is getting the short end of the stick. Torreyes belongs on a big league roster. The problem is that he has already passed through seven big league organizations (Cincinnati Reds, Chicago Cubs, Houston Astros, Toronto Blue Jays, Los Angeles Dodgers, Los Angeles Angels and the Yankees - twice). The Yankees have treated him no differently than any of the other organizations he has passed through. I'm sure the Red Sox would take a flier on him if they didn't already have Holt. Why can't big league organizations see Torreyes' value? For God's sake, somebody at least invite him to spring training.
UPDATE: The Cubs have acquired Torreyes from the Yankees in exchange for cash or a player to be named later. Torreyes was previously in the Cubs' organization during the 2012 and 2013 seasons before being sent to the Astros' organization midway through 2013. Somehow I think Joe Maddon will find a place for him to play. Probably several.
Braves Sign Donaldson; Reunite With McCann
The Atlanta Braves have added two veterans to their lineup. One is a new face while the other one is very familiar.
Josh Donaldson has reportedly signed with the Braves for a one year contract worth $23 million pending a physical.
I cannot fathom why.
The Braves already have a solid third baseman in Johan Camargo at the hot corner. In his second big league season, Camargo hit .272 with 19 HR and 76 RBI in 134 games with the NL East champions. Meanwhile, Donaldson split 2018 with the Toronto Blue Jays and the Cleveland Indians. Injuries limited Donaldson to 52 games in which he hit .246 with 8 HR and 23 RBI.
Do the Braves plan to move Camargo to another position or do they plan to trade him? If it is the latter it is a bit head scratching. After all the Braves have Donaldson for only a year while Camargo doesn't become a free agent until 2024. Both Donaldson and Camargo have birthdays in December. Donaldson is eight years older than Camargo. Are the Braves expecting the Donaldson that won the AL MVP in 2015? While I'm sure he will be better than his injury plagued 2018, his offensive production has declined steadily since 2015. Unless there is still a place for Camargo in the Braves lineup this move doesn't make a lot of sense.
However, reuniting with Brian McCann makes perfect sense. The Georgia native played with the Braves from 2005 through 2013 and was named to 7 NL All-Star teams. McCann signed with the New York Yankees as a free agent in 2014, but would be dealt to the Houston Astros prior after the 2016 season following the emergence of Gary Sanchez. McCann would have the last laugh earning a World Series ring in 2017 with the Astros. Like Donaldson, he has signed a one year contract.
Kurt Suzuki did most of the catching for the Braves in 2018. But now that he will be in a Washington Nationals uniform in 2019, a reunion with McCann was in order. McCann, who turns 35 in February, will be the ideal guide for a young pitching staff.
In summation, the Braves signing McCann for $2 million is far more sound than signing Donaldson for $23 million.
Josh Donaldson has reportedly signed with the Braves for a one year contract worth $23 million pending a physical.
I cannot fathom why.
The Braves already have a solid third baseman in Johan Camargo at the hot corner. In his second big league season, Camargo hit .272 with 19 HR and 76 RBI in 134 games with the NL East champions. Meanwhile, Donaldson split 2018 with the Toronto Blue Jays and the Cleveland Indians. Injuries limited Donaldson to 52 games in which he hit .246 with 8 HR and 23 RBI.
Do the Braves plan to move Camargo to another position or do they plan to trade him? If it is the latter it is a bit head scratching. After all the Braves have Donaldson for only a year while Camargo doesn't become a free agent until 2024. Both Donaldson and Camargo have birthdays in December. Donaldson is eight years older than Camargo. Are the Braves expecting the Donaldson that won the AL MVP in 2015? While I'm sure he will be better than his injury plagued 2018, his offensive production has declined steadily since 2015. Unless there is still a place for Camargo in the Braves lineup this move doesn't make a lot of sense.
However, reuniting with Brian McCann makes perfect sense. The Georgia native played with the Braves from 2005 through 2013 and was named to 7 NL All-Star teams. McCann signed with the New York Yankees as a free agent in 2014, but would be dealt to the Houston Astros prior after the 2016 season following the emergence of Gary Sanchez. McCann would have the last laugh earning a World Series ring in 2017 with the Astros. Like Donaldson, he has signed a one year contract.
Kurt Suzuki did most of the catching for the Braves in 2018. But now that he will be in a Washington Nationals uniform in 2019, a reunion with McCann was in order. McCann, who turns 35 in February, will be the ideal guide for a young pitching staff.
In summation, the Braves signing McCann for $2 million is far more sound than signing Donaldson for $23 million.
Thoughts on The Police Shooting Death of EJ Bradford, Jr. in an Alabama Mall
On Black Friday there was a shooting at the Riverside Galleria in Hoover, Alabama, just outside of Birmingham resulting in two people being injured. At the time, local authorities believed they shot and killed the perpetrator. But it has emerged that Emantic "EJ" Bradford, Jr. was, in fact, not responsible for the shooting and the perpetrator remains at large as of this writing.
Bradford, Jr., a 21-year old U.S. Army veteran, was in fact legally permitted to carry his weapon. This hasn't prevented police in Hoover from blaming Bradford, Jr. for his own death stating, "We can say with certainty Mr. Bradford brandished a gun during the seconds following the gunshots, which instantly heightened the sense of threat to approaching police officers responding to the chaotic scene."
The only problem with this statement is that Bradford, Jr. wasn't the only shopper who drew his weapon during the incident. According to a report by AL.com, "Several shoppers were seen with their guns drawn."
Needless to say this begs several questions.
Why was Bradford, Jr. singled out by the police? If other shoppers also brandished guns during the incident then why didn't police see fit to shoot them?
Were any of the other shoppers who drew weapons African-American? If not then there must remain a suspicion as to whether race was a factor in police seeing fit to shoot and kill Bradford, Jr.
But if there were other African-American shoppers who drew weapons was he shot because he was in close proximity to the police officer in question? In which case, was the good guy with a gun in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Or was there something more nefarious on the part of the police officer responsible? If so will that officer face criminal charges or face any other discipline?
Will the NRA have anything to say about Bradford, Jr.'s death? Will they speak up about his Second Amendment rights?
Whether it does or not, one of the downsides of an armed population in public is that in the chaos of a mass shooting where there appears to be multiple shooters it is difficult for police to tell the good guys apart from the bad guys.
Bradford, Jr., a 21-year old U.S. Army veteran, was in fact legally permitted to carry his weapon. This hasn't prevented police in Hoover from blaming Bradford, Jr. for his own death stating, "We can say with certainty Mr. Bradford brandished a gun during the seconds following the gunshots, which instantly heightened the sense of threat to approaching police officers responding to the chaotic scene."
The only problem with this statement is that Bradford, Jr. wasn't the only shopper who drew his weapon during the incident. According to a report by AL.com, "Several shoppers were seen with their guns drawn."
Needless to say this begs several questions.
Why was Bradford, Jr. singled out by the police? If other shoppers also brandished guns during the incident then why didn't police see fit to shoot them?
Were any of the other shoppers who drew weapons African-American? If not then there must remain a suspicion as to whether race was a factor in police seeing fit to shoot and kill Bradford, Jr.
But if there were other African-American shoppers who drew weapons was he shot because he was in close proximity to the police officer in question? In which case, was the good guy with a gun in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Or was there something more nefarious on the part of the police officer responsible? If so will that officer face criminal charges or face any other discipline?
Will the NRA have anything to say about Bradford, Jr.'s death? Will they speak up about his Second Amendment rights?
Whether it does or not, one of the downsides of an armed population in public is that in the chaos of a mass shooting where there appears to be multiple shooters it is difficult for police to tell the good guys apart from the bad guys.
Are GM's Job Cuts The First Sign of a Trump Recession?
This morning General Motors announced plans to cut nearly 15,000 jobs which could result in the closure of five plants. Four of the plants are in the U.S. - Detroit, Baltimore, Warren, Michigan and Lordstown, Ohio. The fifth plant in Oshawa, Ontario is expected to close immediately resulting in the loss of 2,500 jobs - essentially the backbone of the Canadian auto industry amidst fears of the imposition of tariffs on imported cars by the Trump Administration set to take effect next year. The imposition of tariffs on steel will also be a key factor in the closure of U.S. based plants.
So much for President Trump's promise to revive the manufacturing sector. Indeed, the GM announcement could be the canary in the coal mine. In which case, we can expect more companies to announce massive layoffs in 2019. All of which means we are soon headed for recession. It's not like Charles Koch didn't warn us. For this, Trump will only have himself to blame. The question is whether voters will see fit to blame him.
So much for President Trump's promise to revive the manufacturing sector. Indeed, the GM announcement could be the canary in the coal mine. In which case, we can expect more companies to announce massive layoffs in 2019. All of which means we are soon headed for recession. It's not like Charles Koch didn't warn us. For this, Trump will only have himself to blame. The question is whether voters will see fit to blame him.
Yesterday It Was Tear Gas; Could It Be Bullets Today?
Yesterday, U.S. Border Patrol agents fired tear gas on migrants attempting to cross into the U.S. from Tijuana, Mexico including children.
If the Trump Administration is prepared to fire tear gas at children yesterday, will it fire bullets at them today?
None of this should surprise us, but it should sicken us. Unfortunately, there are a critical mass of Americans who view people of Latin origin to be subhuman and this critical mass is full of bloodlust. I fear they might get exactly what they want.
Donald Trump has made a concerted effort to dehumanize people of Mexican and Latin American origin from the moment he descended the escalator at Trump Tower in June 2015 declaring Mexicans to be criminals and rapists. He continued during the election campaign claiming respected federal jurist Gonzalo Curiel could not preside over the Trump University case because he was a Mexican. Spraying tear gas at children is an extension of his cruel policy separating migrants and children at the border.
I'm afraid the worse is yet to come.
If the Trump Administration is prepared to fire tear gas at children yesterday, will it fire bullets at them today?
None of this should surprise us, but it should sicken us. Unfortunately, there are a critical mass of Americans who view people of Latin origin to be subhuman and this critical mass is full of bloodlust. I fear they might get exactly what they want.
Donald Trump has made a concerted effort to dehumanize people of Mexican and Latin American origin from the moment he descended the escalator at Trump Tower in June 2015 declaring Mexicans to be criminals and rapists. He continued during the election campaign claiming respected federal jurist Gonzalo Curiel could not preside over the Trump University case because he was a Mexican. Spraying tear gas at children is an extension of his cruel policy separating migrants and children at the border.
I'm afraid the worse is yet to come.
Sunday, November 25, 2018
Third Time The Charm For Calgary Stampeders in Grey Cup
After losing back to back Grey Cups to the Ottawa Redblacks and the Toronto Argonauts, the Calgary Stampeders grabbed the brass ring tonight defeating the Redblacks 27-16 to win the 106th Grey Cup in Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium.
The Stampeders lost to the Argos in heartbreaking fashion last year after blowing a 24-16 lead on a fumble late in the fourth quarter. There would be no heartbreak this year as they led the Redblacks from start to finish.
It is the Stampeders eighth Grey Cup title and first championship since 2014 when they defeated the Hamilton Tiger Cats. The Stampeders are arguably the best team in the CFL over the past decade having appeared in four of the last five Grey Cup finals and five of the last seven.
The Stampeders lost to the Argos in heartbreaking fashion last year after blowing a 24-16 lead on a fumble late in the fourth quarter. There would be no heartbreak this year as they led the Redblacks from start to finish.
It is the Stampeders eighth Grey Cup title and first championship since 2014 when they defeated the Hamilton Tiger Cats. The Stampeders are arguably the best team in the CFL over the past decade having appeared in four of the last five Grey Cup finals and five of the last seven.
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Six Observations on Trump Standing With Saudi Arabia
There is much to digest in President Trump's statement on standing with Saudi Arabia. Much of it is hard to swallow. Here are six observations which I hope you will find easy to digest however unappetizing the menu.
1. Iran is The Greater Threat to The United States
The world is a very dangerous place!
The country of Iran, as an example, is responsible for a bloody proxy war against Saudi Arabia in Yemen, trying to destabilize Iraq’s fragile attempt at democracy, supporting the terror group Hezbollah in Lebanon, propping up dictator Bashar Assad in Syria (who has killed millions of his own citizens), and much more. Likewise, the Iranians have killed many Americans and other innocent people throughout the Middle East. Iran states openly, and with great force, “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” Iran is considered “the world’s leading sponsor of terror.”
Here Trump is correct. The Obama Administration took a very different position where it concerned Iran. Indeed, its nuclear agreement with Iran was the centerpiece of its foreign policy. In the course of attaining this objective, the Obama Administration willingly looked the other way as the Iranian regime murdered its own people during its "election" of 2009 and took Americans hostage only to be rewarded for it to the tune of at least $400 million after the deal was done.
So the Obama Administration is willing to make compromises with Iran to achieve its political objectives, the Trump Administration is willing to make compromises with Saudi Arabia to achieve its political objectives.
2. Trump Has a Great Deal of Faith in Saudi Arabia
President Trump believes that Saudi Arabia is eager to withdraw its troops from Yemen, to fight radical Islamic terrorism and accepts Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's denials that he had any involvement in Jamal Khashoggi's murder and if he did, he doesn't really give a damn. Trump's faith in Saudi Arabia is as foolish as Obama's was in Iran.
3. It's All About Money & Oil
After my heavily negotiated trip to Saudi Arabia last year, the Kingdom agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States. This is a record amount of money. It will create hundreds of thousands of jobs, tremendous economic development, and much additional wealth for the United States. Of the $450 billion, $110 billion will be spent on the purchase of military equipment from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and many other great U.S. defense contractors. If we foolishly cancel these contracts, Russia and China would be the enormous beneficiaries – and very happy to acquire all of this newfound business. It would be a wonderful gift to them directly from the United States!
Don't believe a word Trump says when it comes to money. It was only last month when Trump erroneously claimed that Saudi defense contracts were responsible for the creation of 500,000 jobs. Nor do I believe Trump when he claims the Saudis "have been very responsive to my requests to keeping oil prices at reasonable levels". But whatever the veracity of his statements, money and the power that comes with it is what matters to Trump and if a permanent resident of the United States is decapitated in the process then so be it.
4. Trump Sullies Khashoggi
Representatives of Saudi Arabia say that Jamal Khashoggi was an “enemy of the state” and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, but my decision is in no way based on that – this is an unacceptable and horrible crime.
If these statements have no bearing on Trump's decision then why mention it at all? They create the impression that Khashoggi deserved his fate and the Saudis needn't worry about any further consequences.
5. Trump Won't Hold MbS Accountable No Matter What The CIA Says
Our intelligence agencies continue to assess all information, but it could very well be that the Crown Prince had knowledge of this tragic event – maybe he did and maybe he didn’t!
The CIA has concluded MbS ordered Khashoggi's death. Surely Trump is aware of this information and this should be sufficient for him. If Trump has evidence to the contrary then he should produce it. This ambiguity gives aid and comfort to the Saudi regime and demoralizes the men and women who serve under his command.
6. Despite Trump's Foolish Statement, Previous Administrations Wouldn't Have Changed Our Relationship with Saudi Arabia
Notwithstanding the foolishness in much of what Trump said, had Jamal Khashoggi's death occurred under any other President it would not have resulted in a change in relations with Saudi Arabia. For all his courting of Iran, Obama couldn't ignore the needs of Saudi Arabia. The only difference between Trump and his predecessors is that they would have been more circumspect about our relationship with Saudi Arabia and would not have in the process smeared Khashoggi, a dead man who cannot defend himself.
1. Iran is The Greater Threat to The United States
The world is a very dangerous place!
The country of Iran, as an example, is responsible for a bloody proxy war against Saudi Arabia in Yemen, trying to destabilize Iraq’s fragile attempt at democracy, supporting the terror group Hezbollah in Lebanon, propping up dictator Bashar Assad in Syria (who has killed millions of his own citizens), and much more. Likewise, the Iranians have killed many Americans and other innocent people throughout the Middle East. Iran states openly, and with great force, “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” Iran is considered “the world’s leading sponsor of terror.”
Here Trump is correct. The Obama Administration took a very different position where it concerned Iran. Indeed, its nuclear agreement with Iran was the centerpiece of its foreign policy. In the course of attaining this objective, the Obama Administration willingly looked the other way as the Iranian regime murdered its own people during its "election" of 2009 and took Americans hostage only to be rewarded for it to the tune of at least $400 million after the deal was done.
So the Obama Administration is willing to make compromises with Iran to achieve its political objectives, the Trump Administration is willing to make compromises with Saudi Arabia to achieve its political objectives.
2. Trump Has a Great Deal of Faith in Saudi Arabia
President Trump believes that Saudi Arabia is eager to withdraw its troops from Yemen, to fight radical Islamic terrorism and accepts Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's denials that he had any involvement in Jamal Khashoggi's murder and if he did, he doesn't really give a damn. Trump's faith in Saudi Arabia is as foolish as Obama's was in Iran.
3. It's All About Money & Oil
After my heavily negotiated trip to Saudi Arabia last year, the Kingdom agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States. This is a record amount of money. It will create hundreds of thousands of jobs, tremendous economic development, and much additional wealth for the United States. Of the $450 billion, $110 billion will be spent on the purchase of military equipment from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and many other great U.S. defense contractors. If we foolishly cancel these contracts, Russia and China would be the enormous beneficiaries – and very happy to acquire all of this newfound business. It would be a wonderful gift to them directly from the United States!
Don't believe a word Trump says when it comes to money. It was only last month when Trump erroneously claimed that Saudi defense contracts were responsible for the creation of 500,000 jobs. Nor do I believe Trump when he claims the Saudis "have been very responsive to my requests to keeping oil prices at reasonable levels". But whatever the veracity of his statements, money and the power that comes with it is what matters to Trump and if a permanent resident of the United States is decapitated in the process then so be it.
4. Trump Sullies Khashoggi
Representatives of Saudi Arabia say that Jamal Khashoggi was an “enemy of the state” and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, but my decision is in no way based on that – this is an unacceptable and horrible crime.
If these statements have no bearing on Trump's decision then why mention it at all? They create the impression that Khashoggi deserved his fate and the Saudis needn't worry about any further consequences.
5. Trump Won't Hold MbS Accountable No Matter What The CIA Says
Our intelligence agencies continue to assess all information, but it could very well be that the Crown Prince had knowledge of this tragic event – maybe he did and maybe he didn’t!
The CIA has concluded MbS ordered Khashoggi's death. Surely Trump is aware of this information and this should be sufficient for him. If Trump has evidence to the contrary then he should produce it. This ambiguity gives aid and comfort to the Saudi regime and demoralizes the men and women who serve under his command.
6. Despite Trump's Foolish Statement, Previous Administrations Wouldn't Have Changed Our Relationship with Saudi Arabia
Notwithstanding the foolishness in much of what Trump said, had Jamal Khashoggi's death occurred under any other President it would not have resulted in a change in relations with Saudi Arabia. For all his courting of Iran, Obama couldn't ignore the needs of Saudi Arabia. The only difference between Trump and his predecessors is that they would have been more circumspect about our relationship with Saudi Arabia and would not have in the process smeared Khashoggi, a dead man who cannot defend himself.
Adrian Beltre is a First Ballot Hall of Famer
Texas Rangers third baseman Adrian Beltre has called it a career after 21 big league seasons.
There is absolutely no reason the BBWAA shouldn't induct him into Cooperstown in his first year of eligibility in 2024.
Third baseman are scarce in Cooperstown and Beltre's credentials are impeccable - 3,166 career hits, 477 career home runs, 1707 RBI including five 100 plus RBI seasons, four Silver Slugger Awards, five Gold Glove Awards, four AL All-Star appearances and a World Series appearance with the Texas Rangers in 2011.
The Dominican born Beltre made his big league debut with the Los Angeles Dodgers in 1998 at the age of 19. As he retires, he is a few months shy of his 40th birthday. Baseball has been his life. Beltre would come of age in 2004 when he led the NL in home runs with 48. This led to a free agent contract with the Seattle Mariners where he would spend five seasons, but never approached the power he had in LA. After one season in Boston, he would join the Rangers in 2011 and would hit over .300 five times and have four of his five 100 plus RBI seasons. When he is inducted into Cooperstown, Beltre will be wearing a Rangers cap.
There is absolutely no reason the BBWAA shouldn't induct him into Cooperstown in his first year of eligibility in 2024.
Third baseman are scarce in Cooperstown and Beltre's credentials are impeccable - 3,166 career hits, 477 career home runs, 1707 RBI including five 100 plus RBI seasons, four Silver Slugger Awards, five Gold Glove Awards, four AL All-Star appearances and a World Series appearance with the Texas Rangers in 2011.
The Dominican born Beltre made his big league debut with the Los Angeles Dodgers in 1998 at the age of 19. As he retires, he is a few months shy of his 40th birthday. Baseball has been his life. Beltre would come of age in 2004 when he led the NL in home runs with 48. This led to a free agent contract with the Seattle Mariners where he would spend five seasons, but never approached the power he had in LA. After one season in Boston, he would join the Rangers in 2011 and would hit over .300 five times and have four of his five 100 plus RBI seasons. When he is inducted into Cooperstown, Beltre will be wearing a Rangers cap.
Monday, November 19, 2018
Yankees Acquire Paxton From Mariners
The New York Yankees have made a very big move in acquiring southpaw James Paxton from the Seattle Mariners for three minor leaguers including pitcher Justus Sheffield.
The 30-year Canadian born hurler has spent the past six seasons with the Mariners who drafted him in 2010. Paxton has gone 41-26 with a 3.42 ERA. He was my pick to win the AL Cy Young in 2018. He didn't attain that success but Paxton went 11-6 with a 3.76 ERA with a career high 208 strikeouts and a no-hitter against the Toronto Blue Jays this year.
It remains to be seen if the Yankees will hold onto J.A. Happ or reacquire Nathan Eovaldi. But putting in Paxton with Luis Severino, Masahiro Tanaka and C.C. Sabathia makes for a very nice rotation which could give the Red Sox stiff competition in 2019. This might be the best off-season move of all.
The 30-year Canadian born hurler has spent the past six seasons with the Mariners who drafted him in 2010. Paxton has gone 41-26 with a 3.42 ERA. He was my pick to win the AL Cy Young in 2018. He didn't attain that success but Paxton went 11-6 with a 3.76 ERA with a career high 208 strikeouts and a no-hitter against the Toronto Blue Jays this year.
It remains to be seen if the Yankees will hold onto J.A. Happ or reacquire Nathan Eovaldi. But putting in Paxton with Luis Severino, Masahiro Tanaka and C.C. Sabathia makes for a very nice rotation which could give the Red Sox stiff competition in 2019. This might be the best off-season move of all.
Friday, November 16, 2018
Obama Was No Better Than Trump in Picking Ambassadors
President Trump richly deserves to be criticized for his selection of Lana Marks to be this country's new Ambassador to South Africa. Although born in South Africa, Marks is a member of Trump's exclusive Mar-a-Lago club and has a penchant for getting into lawsuits. No wonder Trump likes her.
But let's be honest here. President Obama was no better in picking Ambassadors than Trump is. In 2014, the Obama White House could not state the qualifications soap opera producer Colleen Bell had to be Ambassador to Hungary. Bell bundled more than $2 million on behalf of Obama for his 2012 re-election campaign.
To quote Pete Townshend, "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."
But let's be honest here. President Obama was no better in picking Ambassadors than Trump is. In 2014, the Obama White House could not state the qualifications soap opera producer Colleen Bell had to be Ambassador to Hungary. Bell bundled more than $2 million on behalf of Obama for his 2012 re-election campaign.
To quote Pete Townshend, "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."
How is Marcia Fudge's Possible Challenge of Nancy Pelosi for Speaker Sexist?
Although Democrats will regain control of the House of Representatives in January there is a question if Nancy Pelosi will once again become Speaker of the House.
The question is enough for the likes of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and Salon's Amanda Marcotte to raise the specter of sexism. Marcotte writes:
Frankly, the effort to undermine Pelosi is sexist, and not just because of the disdain so many display for the political talents of a woman who has been far more effective at the job than any of the men who've held it for decades. Ousting her would also be a blow to ordinary women and LGBTQ people whose concerns will lose priority status if the anti-Pelosi wing prevails.
Pelosi's effectiveness as Speaker is highly debatable. Yes, she was critical in ending a dozen years of Republican control of Congress in the 2006 mid-terms, but would fall from grace a mere four years later. So how effective could she have been? Pelosi was probably more effective than Jim Wright or Tom Foley, but Tip O'Neill? Be serious.
But the main problem with Marcotte's thesis is that Pelosi likeliest challenger is Ohio Congresswoman Marcia Fudge. Of course, Marcotte knows this and makes the dubious claim
that Fudge "is openly hostile to LGBTQ rights."
Honestly, I don't care who becomes Speaker of the House. But this reeks of desperation on the part of Pelosi's supporters. If Fudge has such hostility towards the LGBTQ community, I highly doubt she could entertain running for Speaker. And even if Fudge did exhibit such hostility it has absolutely nothing to do with sexism. The sexism card won't work for Nancy Pelosi any better than it did for Hillary Clinton.
ADDENDUM: It should be said that Fudge isn't above using the sexism and racism card as was the case six years ago when she said this is was what motivated the late John McCain's criticisms of then UN Ambassador Susan Rice. Today Fudge finds herself on the other end of the stick.
The question is enough for the likes of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and Salon's Amanda Marcotte to raise the specter of sexism. Marcotte writes:
Frankly, the effort to undermine Pelosi is sexist, and not just because of the disdain so many display for the political talents of a woman who has been far more effective at the job than any of the men who've held it for decades. Ousting her would also be a blow to ordinary women and LGBTQ people whose concerns will lose priority status if the anti-Pelosi wing prevails.
Pelosi's effectiveness as Speaker is highly debatable. Yes, she was critical in ending a dozen years of Republican control of Congress in the 2006 mid-terms, but would fall from grace a mere four years later. So how effective could she have been? Pelosi was probably more effective than Jim Wright or Tom Foley, but Tip O'Neill? Be serious.
But the main problem with Marcotte's thesis is that Pelosi likeliest challenger is Ohio Congresswoman Marcia Fudge. Of course, Marcotte knows this and makes the dubious claim
that Fudge "is openly hostile to LGBTQ rights."
Honestly, I don't care who becomes Speaker of the House. But this reeks of desperation on the part of Pelosi's supporters. If Fudge has such hostility towards the LGBTQ community, I highly doubt she could entertain running for Speaker. And even if Fudge did exhibit such hostility it has absolutely nothing to do with sexism. The sexism card won't work for Nancy Pelosi any better than it did for Hillary Clinton.
ADDENDUM: It should be said that Fudge isn't above using the sexism and racism card as was the case six years ago when she said this is was what motivated the late John McCain's criticisms of then UN Ambassador Susan Rice. Today Fudge finds herself on the other end of the stick.
Thursday, November 15, 2018
Betts & Yelich Win AL & NL MVP Awards
To the surprise of no one the AL and NL MVP were bestowed upon Boston Red Sox outfielder Mookie Betts and Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Christian Yelich.
Betts led the AL in batting average, slugging percentage and runs scored. Throw in a Silver Slugger, a Gold Glove and a World Series ring and you've got an MVP. Betts, who turned 26 last month, hasn't even begun to reach his peak. This might not be his only MVP.
Yelich, who was acquired in the offseason from the Miami Marlins, also led his league in batting average and slugging percentage and had career highs in HR and RBI. Yelich hit an astonishing 21 HR and 53 RBI from August 1st onward. Without him, the Brewers do not reach the post-season much less win the NL Central. Like Betts, Yelich has yet to reach his prime. He turns 27 next month and could have several MVP caliber seasons in him.
Betts led the AL in batting average, slugging percentage and runs scored. Throw in a Silver Slugger, a Gold Glove and a World Series ring and you've got an MVP. Betts, who turned 26 last month, hasn't even begun to reach his peak. This might not be his only MVP.
Yelich, who was acquired in the offseason from the Miami Marlins, also led his league in batting average and slugging percentage and had career highs in HR and RBI. Yelich hit an astonishing 21 HR and 53 RBI from August 1st onward. Without him, the Brewers do not reach the post-season much less win the NL Central. Like Betts, Yelich has yet to reach his prime. He turns 27 next month and could have several MVP caliber seasons in him.
Roy Clark, R.I.P.
When I saw Roy Clark as the top trend on Twitter early this afternoon, I knew immediately he had been summoned for a great gig in the sky. The 85-year old country music legend died this morning of complications of pneumonia.
A child prodigy, Clark played alongside Jimmy Dean while still in his teens. Clark would become best known for co-hosting Hee Haw with Buck Owens from 1969 to 1997. He was a frequent guest host on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson and would put Branson, Missouri on the map in the early 1980's becoming the first country musician to open his own theater in the hillbilly mecca.
His reputation as a comic performer on Hee Haw overshadowed his talent as a guitar virtuoso. A couple of years ago, I was watching an episode of The Odd Couple which featured Clark. At the conclusion of the episode, Clark played "Malaguena". There are no special effects. He is shredding that guitar. R.I.P.
A child prodigy, Clark played alongside Jimmy Dean while still in his teens. Clark would become best known for co-hosting Hee Haw with Buck Owens from 1969 to 1997. He was a frequent guest host on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson and would put Branson, Missouri on the map in the early 1980's becoming the first country musician to open his own theater in the hillbilly mecca.
His reputation as a comic performer on Hee Haw overshadowed his talent as a guitar virtuoso. A couple of years ago, I was watching an episode of The Odd Couple which featured Clark. At the conclusion of the episode, Clark played "Malaguena". There are no special effects. He is shredding that guitar. R.I.P.
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Snell & de Grom Win AL & NL Cy Young Awards
Tampa Bay Rays lefty Blake Snell and New York Mets ace Jacob de Grom were named the AL and NL Cy Young Awards. It is the first Cy Young for both pitchers.
After going 5-7 with a 4.04 ERA in 2017, Snell had a breakthrough season in 2018 leading the AL in wins with 21 and with a 1.89 ERA. Snell, 25, also fanned 221 batters and beat out Houston Astros ace Justin Verlander to win the honors.
Although de Grom had less than stellar 10-9 won loss record, he led the NL with a 1.70 ERA fanning 269 batters in 217 innings pitched and bested three time Cy Young winner Max Scherzer.
Tomorrow the AL and NL MVP Award winner will be announced.
After going 5-7 with a 4.04 ERA in 2017, Snell had a breakthrough season in 2018 leading the AL in wins with 21 and with a 1.89 ERA. Snell, 25, also fanned 221 batters and beat out Houston Astros ace Justin Verlander to win the honors.
Although de Grom had less than stellar 10-9 won loss record, he led the NL with a 1.70 ERA fanning 269 batters in 217 innings pitched and bested three time Cy Young winner Max Scherzer.
Tomorrow the AL and NL MVP Award winner will be announced.
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
Melvin & Snitker Win AL & NL Manager of the Year Honors
Oakland A's skipper Bob Melvin and Brian Snitker of the Atlanta Braves have been bestowed with AL and NL Manager of the Year honors.
Melvin bested Boston Red Sox manager Alex Cora and Tampa Bay Rays skipper Kevin Cash for the award. My vote would have gone to Cash who guided a team expected to lose 100 games win 90 games with only one regular starting pitcher. Nevertheless, the A's were expected to finish at or near the bottom of the AL West and for much of the season were the best team in MLB eventually earning a AL Wild Card berth. This is the third time Melvin has won this honor earning it in the NL with the Arizona Diamondbacks in 2007 and with the A's back in 2012.
A four decade lifer with the Braves, this is the first time Snitker has won NL Manager of the Year as he guided the team to its first NL East title in five years. In an age where other MLB franchises are hiring managers without any managerial experience, it is nice to see someone who has paid his dues earn some recognition. The only question is will other clubs follow suit.
Tomorrow the AL and NL Cy Young Award winners will be announced.
Melvin bested Boston Red Sox manager Alex Cora and Tampa Bay Rays skipper Kevin Cash for the award. My vote would have gone to Cash who guided a team expected to lose 100 games win 90 games with only one regular starting pitcher. Nevertheless, the A's were expected to finish at or near the bottom of the AL West and for much of the season were the best team in MLB eventually earning a AL Wild Card berth. This is the third time Melvin has won this honor earning it in the NL with the Arizona Diamondbacks in 2007 and with the A's back in 2012.
A four decade lifer with the Braves, this is the first time Snitker has won NL Manager of the Year as he guided the team to its first NL East title in five years. In an age where other MLB franchises are hiring managers without any managerial experience, it is nice to see someone who has paid his dues earn some recognition. The only question is will other clubs follow suit.
Tomorrow the AL and NL Cy Young Award winners will be announced.
Monday, November 12, 2018
Ohtani & Acuna, Jr. Win AL & NL Rookie of the Year Honors
Los Angeles Angels pitcher/DH Shohei Ohtani and Atlanta Braves outfielder Ronald Acuna, Jr. have won the 2018 AL and NL Rookie of the Year honors.
Ohtani's win is controversial here in NYC. Local fans believe the honor should have gone to runner up Miguel Andujar of the New York Yankees. While Ohtani is unique in being both a pitcher and an everyday player his stats weren't exactly Ruthian. Ohtani hit .285 with 22 HR and 61 RBI in 104 games and in 10 starts he went 4-2 with a 3.31 ERA. Good stuff, but not great. Last month, Ohtani underwent Tommy John surgery and won't pitch in 2019. Meanwhile, Andujar grabbed the third base job and was a critical piece to the Yankees' AL Wild Card team with 27 HR and 92 RBI and just missed hitting .300.
Yankees fans perceive a bias against their players and they might be right. Some BBWAA members held Hideki Matsui's time in Japan against him during his 2003 rookie campaign. This was not the case with Ohtani. I suspect if Ohtani were in Yankees pinstripes and Andujar were wearing a halo on his cap the results would probably be different.
Acuna is a different story. The 20-year old Venezuelan hit .293 with 26 HR and 64 RBI in 111 games and led the Braves to their first NL East title in five years.
Tomorrow the AL and NL Managers of the Year will be announced.
Ohtani's win is controversial here in NYC. Local fans believe the honor should have gone to runner up Miguel Andujar of the New York Yankees. While Ohtani is unique in being both a pitcher and an everyday player his stats weren't exactly Ruthian. Ohtani hit .285 with 22 HR and 61 RBI in 104 games and in 10 starts he went 4-2 with a 3.31 ERA. Good stuff, but not great. Last month, Ohtani underwent Tommy John surgery and won't pitch in 2019. Meanwhile, Andujar grabbed the third base job and was a critical piece to the Yankees' AL Wild Card team with 27 HR and 92 RBI and just missed hitting .300.
Yankees fans perceive a bias against their players and they might be right. Some BBWAA members held Hideki Matsui's time in Japan against him during his 2003 rookie campaign. This was not the case with Ohtani. I suspect if Ohtani were in Yankees pinstripes and Andujar were wearing a halo on his cap the results would probably be different.
Acuna is a different story. The 20-year old Venezuelan hit .293 with 26 HR and 64 RBI in 111 games and led the Braves to their first NL East title in five years.
Tomorrow the AL and NL Managers of the Year will be announced.
Friday, November 9, 2018
Does Joe Mauer Have a Chance at Cooperstown?
Joe Mauer has formally called it career with an open letter to Minnesota Twins fans.
Mauer, a native of St. Paul, played his entire 15-year MLB career with the Twins. In 2006, Mauer became the first catcher to win a batting title since Ernie Lombardi in 1942. Mauer would repeat the feat in 2008 and 2009. It was in '09, that Mauer would win his lone AL MVP with a career high .365 average with 28 HR and 96 RBI. Mauer was certainly the best catcher in the AL between 2006 and 2013 with six AL All-Star selections, five Silver Slugger Awards, three Gold Gloves and three post-season appearances.
Unfortunately concussions forced Mauer to convert to first base full time in 2014 and his offensive production never recovered. He would not put on the catcher's gear again until his final big league game when he caught one pitch.
Given that Mauer played less than half his career games behind the plate, it could work against him getting into the Baseball Hall of Fame. On the other hand, Mauer is so strongly identified with the Twins that it might get him over the hump much like the late Kirby Puckett. Mauer might not get in on the first ballot, but he will get a good look.
Mauer, a native of St. Paul, played his entire 15-year MLB career with the Twins. In 2006, Mauer became the first catcher to win a batting title since Ernie Lombardi in 1942. Mauer would repeat the feat in 2008 and 2009. It was in '09, that Mauer would win his lone AL MVP with a career high .365 average with 28 HR and 96 RBI. Mauer was certainly the best catcher in the AL between 2006 and 2013 with six AL All-Star selections, five Silver Slugger Awards, three Gold Gloves and three post-season appearances.
Given that Mauer played less than half his career games behind the plate, it could work against him getting into the Baseball Hall of Fame. On the other hand, Mauer is so strongly identified with the Twins that it might get him over the hump much like the late Kirby Puckett. Mauer might not get in on the first ballot, but he will get a good look.
What Does Effective Gun Control Mean?
The massacre at the Borderline Bar & Grill in Thousand Oaks, California which claimed the lives of a dozen people on Wednesday night has spawned calls for more "effective gun control". One of those making such a call is Helaine Olen of The Washington Post. (Full disclosure: We follow each other on Twitter, have occasionally exchanged messages and she has also imparted useful advice. So if she sees this I hope she takes these remarks in the spirit they are intended.):
It’s tempting to look for other causes. Many of us likely feel otherwise helpless. Gun violence occurs despite the fact that poll after poll shows that most Americans support significantly increased restrictions on gun ownership. But there is one horrifying massacre after another, and only, at best, small changes are made. Too many politicians remain under the thumb of the National Rifle Association. It took Parkland get the Florida legislature to pass laws that mandate background checks on gun purchasers and ban people younger than 21 from buying guns altogether. Tuesday’s elections did not change much. Yes, a number of gun control advocates scored victories, notably Lucy McBath (D), who defeated NRA-endorsed Rep. Karen Handel (R) in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District. But in Florida, the mass organizing by the Parkland students was not able to prevent NRA-backed Rick Scott (R) and Ron DeSantis (R) from apparently winning their elections for the Senate and the governor’s office, respectively.
As for President Trump, he spent weeks talking up a fictional threat from a caravan of desperate immigrants, and rails against “American carnage,” while refusing to acknowledge the seriousness of the ongoing homegrown and all too real and horrifying threat of our lack of effective gun control. On Thursday morning he tweeted, “God bless all of the victims and families of the victims.” This is a failure of politics and morality. The time for bromides and excuses is long past. This is no way to live — or, increasingly, die.
Olen laments "our lack of effective gun control." Yet she curiously omits the fact that California has the strictest gun control measures in the country with more measures to take effect in 2019. Yet based on the alleged perpetrator's history, none of these measures would have prevented what happened the other night with perhaps the possible exception of the police requesting a gun violence restraining order. But there is no guarantee police would have intervened any more than mental health professionals who had previously dealt with the alleged perpetrator.
So, in a sense, Olen might be correct in stating that this country has a "lack of effective gun control". But what does "effective gun control" mean? Olen doesn't define what this entails. It would be useful to know what measures, if any, she has in mind.
For all of President Trump's demagoguery, former President Obama's default response on guns was to say he "can't sit around and do nothing". It isn't a question of doing nothing. Something is being done. It's just that something doesn't work.
I'm not a NRA member. I don't want a gun and I'm not stopping anyone from implementing gun control. Implement all the gun control measures you like up to and including the repeal of the Second Amendment. I strongly suspect gun control advocates won't be happy with the results and will still lament the "lack of effective gun control." The War on Guns will be no more successful than the War on Poverty, the War on Drugs or the War on Terror.
Thursday, November 8, 2018
What Does Alyssa Milano Think of President Obama's Photo With Farrakhan?
Actress Alyssa Milano, these days best known for her liberal activism with the #MeToo movement, has distanced herself from the Women's March and two prominent figures within the movement - Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory for their refusal to denounce the anti-Semitism of Nation of Islam founder Louis Farrakhan.
In an interview with Advocate, Milano said, “Any time that there is any bigotry or anti-Semitism in that respect, it needs to be called out and addressed. I’m disappointed in the leadership of the Women’s March that they haven’t done it adequately.” Milano went on the say that she does not plan to participate in the Women's March in the future until the question of anti-Semitism is addressed.
Good for her. I wish more Democrats and so called progressives would speak out against Farrakhan.
Yet this leaves me with a question. What does she think of President Obama for meeting Farrakhan in 2005 shortly after his election to the Senate and having his picture taken with him? After all, Milano has long been a supporter of Obama and praised him and Michelle Obama for their service shortly before he left office in January 2017.
Would she distance herself from Obama as she has from the leadership of the Women's March?
Would she distance herself from Obama for his failure to not only to denounce Farrakhan and his anti-Semitism, but to give him legitimacy?
Or would she stop short for fear running afoul her left-wing allies?
Either way I would like to know.
In an interview with Advocate, Milano said, “Any time that there is any bigotry or anti-Semitism in that respect, it needs to be called out and addressed. I’m disappointed in the leadership of the Women’s March that they haven’t done it adequately.” Milano went on the say that she does not plan to participate in the Women's March in the future until the question of anti-Semitism is addressed.
Good for her. I wish more Democrats and so called progressives would speak out against Farrakhan.
Yet this leaves me with a question. What does she think of President Obama for meeting Farrakhan in 2005 shortly after his election to the Senate and having his picture taken with him? After all, Milano has long been a supporter of Obama and praised him and Michelle Obama for their service shortly before he left office in January 2017.
Would she distance herself from Obama as she has from the leadership of the Women's March?
Would she distance herself from Obama for his failure to not only to denounce Farrakhan and his anti-Semitism, but to give him legitimacy?
Or would she stop short for fear running afoul her left-wing allies?
Either way I would like to know.
For Trump It Was Just Another Wednesday
Yesterday, the President of the United States had quite the day.
President Trump publicly castigated defeated Republican Congressmen he deemed insufficiently loyal (Utah Congresswoman Mia Love was chided for "giving him no love").
He then called CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta "a rude, terrible person" and then had his press credentials stripped amidst allegations he "assaulted" a White House intern.
Oh, yes. He fired his Attorney General on Twitter characterizing it as a resignation. Replacing Jeff Sessions is Matthew Whitaker, a man who considers the Mueller probe a witch hunt.
In another time, it would have been a catastrophic day which would have shaken our Republic to its very core.
But for President Trump it was just another Wednesday.
And this morning we awake to another mass shooting in California. It is just another Thursday.
I can't wait for the week to be over.
President Trump publicly castigated defeated Republican Congressmen he deemed insufficiently loyal (Utah Congresswoman Mia Love was chided for "giving him no love").
He then called CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta "a rude, terrible person" and then had his press credentials stripped amidst allegations he "assaulted" a White House intern.
Oh, yes. He fired his Attorney General on Twitter characterizing it as a resignation. Replacing Jeff Sessions is Matthew Whitaker, a man who considers the Mueller probe a witch hunt.
In another time, it would have been a catastrophic day which would have shaken our Republic to its very core.
But for President Trump it was just another Wednesday.
And this morning we awake to another mass shooting in California. It is just another Thursday.
I can't wait for the week to be over.
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
The Best Years of Our Lives & The 2018 Mid-Term Elections
For the first time in living memory, I made a point of not watching any election returns on TV. Instead, I spent the evening watching Star Trek and then flipping to TCM where I watched Casablanca and The Best Years of Our Lives.
Occasionally I would check election results on Twitter. Democrats won control of the House as expected, but fell well short in the Senate. Indeed, Republicans wrested control of four Senate seats from Democrats in Indiana, Missouri, North Dakota and it appears Rick Scott has defeated Bill Nelson in Florida. The only gain Democrats made in the Senate was in Nevada. Beto O'Rourke made things close in Texas, but we will be hearing Ted Cruz droning on for another six years. I suspect that most Republican Senators wish O'Rourke had prevailed. No doubt the Bret Kavanaugh hearings mobilized and motivated Republicans far more than Democrats who can look forward to Nancy Pelosi being Speaker once again.
Democrats also fell short in gubernatorial races in Florida and Georgia although the latter race seems rather dodgy. The Republican candidate, Brian Kemp, is also Secretary of State and was in charge of overseeing his own election. Democrats did gain governor's mansions in Illinois, Michigan, New Mexico, Maine, Kansas and in Wisconsin where three term Governor Scott Walker was defeated by Tony Evers.
The only Republican I was pleased to see win last night was Charlie Baker who was elected to a second term as Governor in Massachusetts. Had I still been living in the Bay State he would have had my vote. I don't worship the ground on which he walks, but he is a decent fellow and they are in short supply in the electoral arena.
Despite Democrats winning the House and a few governorships, last night was not 1994 or 2010. It was not a rebuke of Trumpism. While the Texas Senate election shouldn't have been this close, if Democrats honestly think O'Rourke can defeat Trump when he couldn't beat Cruz they are going to be even angrier two years from now.
Then again we never know what the future holds for us. The Best Years of Our Lives was released 72 years ago this month and told the story of three returning WWII veterans. It would win seven Academy Awards including Best Picture and Best Supporting Actor for Harold Russell, a real life veteran amputee in his screen debut. Amidst the euphoria of returning home and wanting to have a good time, the tone of the film was one of uncertainty and throughout there is fear of yet another Great Depression. Given that many WWI veterans returned home to unemployment there was little reason to believe a post-war economic boom was around the corner.
To most people living in 2018, 1946 is completely unfathomable and unrecognizable. Yet life is every bit as uncertain in 2018 as it was in 1946 and shall always be uncertain no matter who we choose to elect. I'm not saying who we elect doesn't matter. I want the Trump presidency to come to an end and for him to be replaced by someone of character and honesty. But even if Trump is defeated in 2020 it won't take away our problems. People will still struggle to make ends meet and there will be forces both internal and external who wish to do us grievous harm. We shall always be tested - in the worst years of our lives and in the best years of our lives. Although it is difficult to acknowledge, the best and worst years of our lives often occur at the very same time.
Occasionally I would check election results on Twitter. Democrats won control of the House as expected, but fell well short in the Senate. Indeed, Republicans wrested control of four Senate seats from Democrats in Indiana, Missouri, North Dakota and it appears Rick Scott has defeated Bill Nelson in Florida. The only gain Democrats made in the Senate was in Nevada. Beto O'Rourke made things close in Texas, but we will be hearing Ted Cruz droning on for another six years. I suspect that most Republican Senators wish O'Rourke had prevailed. No doubt the Bret Kavanaugh hearings mobilized and motivated Republicans far more than Democrats who can look forward to Nancy Pelosi being Speaker once again.
Democrats also fell short in gubernatorial races in Florida and Georgia although the latter race seems rather dodgy. The Republican candidate, Brian Kemp, is also Secretary of State and was in charge of overseeing his own election. Democrats did gain governor's mansions in Illinois, Michigan, New Mexico, Maine, Kansas and in Wisconsin where three term Governor Scott Walker was defeated by Tony Evers.
The only Republican I was pleased to see win last night was Charlie Baker who was elected to a second term as Governor in Massachusetts. Had I still been living in the Bay State he would have had my vote. I don't worship the ground on which he walks, but he is a decent fellow and they are in short supply in the electoral arena.
Despite Democrats winning the House and a few governorships, last night was not 1994 or 2010. It was not a rebuke of Trumpism. While the Texas Senate election shouldn't have been this close, if Democrats honestly think O'Rourke can defeat Trump when he couldn't beat Cruz they are going to be even angrier two years from now.
Then again we never know what the future holds for us. The Best Years of Our Lives was released 72 years ago this month and told the story of three returning WWII veterans. It would win seven Academy Awards including Best Picture and Best Supporting Actor for Harold Russell, a real life veteran amputee in his screen debut. Amidst the euphoria of returning home and wanting to have a good time, the tone of the film was one of uncertainty and throughout there is fear of yet another Great Depression. Given that many WWI veterans returned home to unemployment there was little reason to believe a post-war economic boom was around the corner.
To most people living in 2018, 1946 is completely unfathomable and unrecognizable. Yet life is every bit as uncertain in 2018 as it was in 1946 and shall always be uncertain no matter who we choose to elect. I'm not saying who we elect doesn't matter. I want the Trump presidency to come to an end and for him to be replaced by someone of character and honesty. But even if Trump is defeated in 2020 it won't take away our problems. People will still struggle to make ends meet and there will be forces both internal and external who wish to do us grievous harm. We shall always be tested - in the worst years of our lives and in the best years of our lives. Although it is difficult to acknowledge, the best and worst years of our lives often occur at the very same time.
Monday, November 5, 2018
A Response to Roger Angell: Why I Won't Be Voting in The 2018 Mid-Terms
Roger Angell, one of the best baseball writers this country has ever produced, has written an essay for The New Yorker imploring people to get off their asses and vote - at least those how intend to vote Democrat tomorrow:
I am ninety-eight now, legally blind, and a pain in the ass to all my friends and much of my family with my constant rantings about the Trump debacle—his floods of lies, his racism, his abandonment of vital connections to ancient allies and critically urgent world concerns, his relentless attacks on the media, and, just lately, his arrant fearmongering about the agonizingly slow approach of a fading column of frightened Central American refugees. The not-to-mention list takes us to his scorn for the poor everywhere, his dismantling contempt for the F.B.I. and the Justice Department, and his broad ignorance and overriding failure of human response. A Democratic victory in this midterm election, in the House, at the least, will put a halt to a lot of this and prevent something much worse.
If the Democrats only win the House tomorrow with Republicans still controlling the Senate, I'm not sure how much it will halt Trump's agenda. Otherwise, I have no disagreement with everything up to his last sentence. I am appalled by Trump's being and his actions. However, here is where I part company with Angell:
What we can all do at this moment is vote—get up, brush our teeth, go to the polling place, and get in line. I was never in combat as a soldier, but now I am. Those of you who haven’t quite been getting to your polling place lately, who want better candidates or a clearer system of making yourself heard, or who just aren’t in the habit, need to get it done, this time around. If you stay home, count yourself among the hundreds of thousands now being disenfranchised by the relentless parade of restrictions that Republicans everywhere are imposing and enforcing. If you don’t vote, they have won, and you are a captive, one of their prizes.
No one is entitled to my vote. If a candidate wants my vote then he or she must earn it. As such I have no plans to vote tomorrow.
To start with, I have recently moved to New York City and reside in its 10th Congressional District, one of the most liberal in the country. Jerrold Nadler, who is seeking his 14th term in office, will not need my help in getting re-elected let alone Governor Cuomo or Senator Gillibrand. My Dad tried to enlist the help of Nadler's office with regard to his Medicare and let's just say they weren't very helpful. So he will not be getting my vote. Over the weekend, we bumped into his Republican opponent Naomi Levin outside Fairway's on Broadway & West 74th. She wasn't exactly eager to answer his question about marijuana legalization nor was I interested in engaging her. I have nothing against Gillibrand per se, but Cuomo's declaration in August that "America was never that great" makes me question why he is involved in civic life at all. Frankly, I haven't lived here long enough to properly assess my state representative or state Senator or meaningfully render a judgment on any ballot initiatives.
Now had I still been living in Massachusetts, I would have cast a ballot for Charlie Baker in his re-election bid for Governor. Baker is one of the few Republicans who don't disgust me with his consistent opposition to Trump. Indeed, I wrote him and Ben Sasse in on my ballot in 2016. In his final debate with his Democrat opponent Jay Gonzalez last week, Baker called Trump "outrageous, disgraceful and a divider." I certainly wouldn't have voted for Elizabeth Warren, but nor would I have voted for Trump apologist Geoff Diehl.
But the reality is that I now reside in New York and as much I despise Trump, the Democrats in charge haven't earned my vote.
With that said, I will certainly vote against Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Who I vote for, however, very much remains to be seen.
I am ninety-eight now, legally blind, and a pain in the ass to all my friends and much of my family with my constant rantings about the Trump debacle—his floods of lies, his racism, his abandonment of vital connections to ancient allies and critically urgent world concerns, his relentless attacks on the media, and, just lately, his arrant fearmongering about the agonizingly slow approach of a fading column of frightened Central American refugees. The not-to-mention list takes us to his scorn for the poor everywhere, his dismantling contempt for the F.B.I. and the Justice Department, and his broad ignorance and overriding failure of human response. A Democratic victory in this midterm election, in the House, at the least, will put a halt to a lot of this and prevent something much worse.
If the Democrats only win the House tomorrow with Republicans still controlling the Senate, I'm not sure how much it will halt Trump's agenda. Otherwise, I have no disagreement with everything up to his last sentence. I am appalled by Trump's being and his actions. However, here is where I part company with Angell:
What we can all do at this moment is vote—get up, brush our teeth, go to the polling place, and get in line. I was never in combat as a soldier, but now I am. Those of you who haven’t quite been getting to your polling place lately, who want better candidates or a clearer system of making yourself heard, or who just aren’t in the habit, need to get it done, this time around. If you stay home, count yourself among the hundreds of thousands now being disenfranchised by the relentless parade of restrictions that Republicans everywhere are imposing and enforcing. If you don’t vote, they have won, and you are a captive, one of their prizes.
No one is entitled to my vote. If a candidate wants my vote then he or she must earn it. As such I have no plans to vote tomorrow.
To start with, I have recently moved to New York City and reside in its 10th Congressional District, one of the most liberal in the country. Jerrold Nadler, who is seeking his 14th term in office, will not need my help in getting re-elected let alone Governor Cuomo or Senator Gillibrand. My Dad tried to enlist the help of Nadler's office with regard to his Medicare and let's just say they weren't very helpful. So he will not be getting my vote. Over the weekend, we bumped into his Republican opponent Naomi Levin outside Fairway's on Broadway & West 74th. She wasn't exactly eager to answer his question about marijuana legalization nor was I interested in engaging her. I have nothing against Gillibrand per se, but Cuomo's declaration in August that "America was never that great" makes me question why he is involved in civic life at all. Frankly, I haven't lived here long enough to properly assess my state representative or state Senator or meaningfully render a judgment on any ballot initiatives.
Now had I still been living in Massachusetts, I would have cast a ballot for Charlie Baker in his re-election bid for Governor. Baker is one of the few Republicans who don't disgust me with his consistent opposition to Trump. Indeed, I wrote him and Ben Sasse in on my ballot in 2016. In his final debate with his Democrat opponent Jay Gonzalez last week, Baker called Trump "outrageous, disgraceful and a divider." I certainly wouldn't have voted for Elizabeth Warren, but nor would I have voted for Trump apologist Geoff Diehl.
But the reality is that I now reside in New York and as much I despise Trump, the Democrats in charge haven't earned my vote.
With that said, I will certainly vote against Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Who I vote for, however, very much remains to be seen.
Saturday, November 3, 2018
Blue Jays & Rangers Hire First Time Managers in Montoyo & Woodward
Both the Toronto Blue Jays and Texas Rangers have new first time big league managers.
Earlier this week, the Jays hired longtime Tampa Bay Ray alum Charlie Montoyo to be their new skipper while the Rangers today tabbed Los Angeles Dodgers third base coach Chris Woodward as their new man in the dugout.
Montoyo succeeds John Gibbons who guided the Jays to back to back losing seasons after back to back post-season appearances in 2015 and 2016. He joined the Rays even before they ever took the field in 1997 and managed in their minor league system until joining Kevin Cash's coaching staff in 2015 first as the bench coach before becoming third base coach this season. For his part, Montoyo has said he doesn't see deploying an opener as the Rays so frequently did in 2018. It will be interesting to see how Montoyo works with Vladimir Guerrero, Jr. Montoyo was briefly teammates with his father Vladimir Guerrero with the Montreal Expos in 1993.
While Montoyo's big league playing career lasted only four games, Woodward spent 12 seasons in MLB primarily as a shortstop with the Blue Jays, New York Mets, Atlanta Braves, two stints with the Seattle Mariners and the Boston Red Sox before finishing his career with the Jays in 2011.
The following year Woodward returned to the Mariners as their minor league infield coordinator and became the club's infield coach at the big league level in 2014. He became the Dodgers' third base coach in 2016 and was part of back to back NL champions in 2017 and 2018. Woodward's only managerial experience came during the World Baseball Classic when he managed New Zealand during the qualifying rounds in 2016.
Woodward succeeds Jeff Banister. Like Gibbons in Toronto, after back to back playoff appearances in 2015 and 2016, the Rangers fell on hard times and finished last in the AL West in both 2017 and 2018. The Rangers dismissed Banister on September 21st. Bench coach Don Wakamatsu took over for the remainder of the season. Some thought Wakamatsu, who managed the Mariners in 2009 and 2010, could be a full time replacement. But the Rangers are continuing the trend of hiring first time big league managers. It is unclear if Wakamatsu will remain with the Rangers in 2019.
Both Montoyo and Woodward will have their work cut out turning around former post-season rivals. Although not as big as whoever is hired to be the new manager of the Baltimore Orioles who are coming off a 115 loss season.
Thursday, November 1, 2018
Why I Couldn't Bring Myself to Watch The 2018 Red Sox World Series Parade
While I have no trouble walking around New York City wearing Boston Red Sox regalia, I could not bring myself to watch yesterday's World Series parade on TV or online.
Frankly, it would have hurt too much. After all, coming to NYC not part of my plans and an act of desperation. At the time, I tried to put a happy face on it. I wrote, "I shall root for the Red Sox for the duration of 2018 even if it means missing a World Series parade. Well, I've been to three of them."
As it turns out three isn't enough. Although I was certainly rooting for the Red Sox against the Yankees there was a part of me which wanted the Astros to prevail in the ALCS and an even bigger part of me that wanted the Dodgers to win the World Series just so I wouldn't have to face this conundrum. Another part of me was tempted to take a bus up to Boston and go to the parade. This would have required taking a day off work, finding a place to crash for the night or perhaps making it a very long day trip. But my housing issues in Boston still haven't been resolved and going up there would have been a reminder of it. Perhaps this is the price to pay for moving out of Boston or at least a small part of it.
When I told one of my new colleagues that part of me was rooting against the Red Sox, he said I was being selfish and I told him he is exactly right. Most people never experience anything like much less thrice in a lifetime. This fellow is a Knicks fan who have not won a NBA Title since 1973. Other franchises have had longer droughts, but this man believes with all his heart that all five boroughs will shut down if the Knicks ever win it all again.
I told him that although I've been to three World Series parades, I always kept in mind that each parade could be my last. He could see I was genuinely pained about not being in Boston yesterday telling, "The win is more important than the parade. The win is forever." This is true, but the parade is a part of the championship. The Boston Red Sox had their greatest season ever and I couldn't be there with them in the end and be part of the reverie of the promised land. And if I couldn't be there in the flesh, I didn't want to see it all.
With that I'm glad I posted a few minutes of the 2013 World Series Parade to YouTube. It is the only video I have ever uploaded.
Frankly, it would have hurt too much. After all, coming to NYC not part of my plans and an act of desperation. At the time, I tried to put a happy face on it. I wrote, "I shall root for the Red Sox for the duration of 2018 even if it means missing a World Series parade. Well, I've been to three of them."
As it turns out three isn't enough. Although I was certainly rooting for the Red Sox against the Yankees there was a part of me which wanted the Astros to prevail in the ALCS and an even bigger part of me that wanted the Dodgers to win the World Series just so I wouldn't have to face this conundrum. Another part of me was tempted to take a bus up to Boston and go to the parade. This would have required taking a day off work, finding a place to crash for the night or perhaps making it a very long day trip. But my housing issues in Boston still haven't been resolved and going up there would have been a reminder of it. Perhaps this is the price to pay for moving out of Boston or at least a small part of it.
When I told one of my new colleagues that part of me was rooting against the Red Sox, he said I was being selfish and I told him he is exactly right. Most people never experience anything like much less thrice in a lifetime. This fellow is a Knicks fan who have not won a NBA Title since 1973. Other franchises have had longer droughts, but this man believes with all his heart that all five boroughs will shut down if the Knicks ever win it all again.
I told him that although I've been to three World Series parades, I always kept in mind that each parade could be my last. He could see I was genuinely pained about not being in Boston yesterday telling, "The win is more important than the parade. The win is forever." This is true, but the parade is a part of the championship. The Boston Red Sox had their greatest season ever and I couldn't be there with them in the end and be part of the reverie of the promised land. And if I couldn't be there in the flesh, I didn't want to see it all.
With that I'm glad I posted a few minutes of the 2013 World Series Parade to YouTube. It is the only video I have ever uploaded.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)