Trump's "Impractical" on Reporting Profits From Foreign Gov'ts Equals Hillary's "Convenience" For Her EMail

From Russell Berman in The Atlantic:


Days before taking office, Donald Trump said his company would donate all profits from foreign governments to the U.S. Treasury, part of an effort to avoid even the appearance of a conflict with the Constitution’s emoluments clause.


Now, however, the Trump Organization is telling Congress that determining exactly how much of its profits come from foreign governments is simply more trouble than it’s worth.


In response to a document request from the House Oversight Committee, Trump’s company sent a copy of an eight-page pamphlet detailing how it plans to track payments it receives from foreign governments at the firm’s many hotels, golf courses, and restaurants across the globe. But while the Trump Organization said it would set aside all money it collects from customers that identify themselves as representing a foreign government, it would not undertake a more intensive effort to determine if a payment would violate the Constitution’s prohibition on public office holders accepting an “emolument” from a foreign state.


“To fully and completely identify all patronage at our Properties by customer type is impractical in the service industry and putting forth a policy that requires all guests to identify themselves would impede upon personal privacy and diminish the guest experience of our brand,” the Trump Organization wrote in its policy pamphlet, which the company’s chief compliance officer said had been distributed to general managers and senior officials at all of its properties.


I suppose a Sheikh having a dalliance with a blonde, American escort at the Trump International Hotel in Dubai would want to keep his business private and, ahem, not diminish his "guest experience."


But when I hear the Trump organization that complying with The Constitution is "impractical" I hear Hillary Clinton saying she set up her State Department email on her private server out of "convenience."


In other words, the law is only for us regular folks. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are above the law. It is yet another reminder of why I could not cast a vote for either candidate last November and why I refuse to lower myself to their standards and legitimize their contempt for the law. In an earlier time, this state of affairs provokes the Magna Carta, the French Revolution and The Declaration of Independence. But as long as we can binge on food and TV and have an internet connection we are content. Or we express outrage at one side while giving the other a pass and vice versa. We should be better than this, but we are not.